| W E L C O M E G U E S T S Welcome to 6 Star Wrestling. We are a small community of dedicated wrestling fans. Our forum members range from new to the product to 20+ years of viewer knowledge of the product. We discuss WWE, TNA, ROH, WCW, and various other wrestling companies. Regardless if you have just watched your first wrestling show or if you have been following wrestling your entire life, I guarantee that you'll find someone to have an in-depth and enjoyable conversation with. We also have discussions that are not related to wrestling. We discuss movies, music, news, play games, and do all sorts of fun and interesting things. So even if you are not a wrestling fan, we can guarantee you'll find something to keep your interest while you are here. Feel free to follow us on Twitter and Like us on Facebook with the links below! Please enjoy, The 6 Star Community Register your free account today! http://6starwrestling.net http://twitter.com/6StarWrestling http://facebook.com/6StarWrestling |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Wrestling Rings; How interesting they are | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Feb 4 2006, 06:58 AM (747 Views) | |
| Nubochanozep | Feb 4 2006, 06:58 AM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Indeed, they are interesting! I always used to wonder what they are, how they're made and such, and what keeps them standing up. Well now that I know (as a result of a forum that I'm a casual member of), I thought this could be an interesting factoid to promote, seeing as I was always so eager to find out what they were made of and such. The WWE wrestling ring, and every other decent ring is started by putting four turnbuckle posts up that actually have a very large base, they're a lot taller then you'd think too. Steel beams are then joined to and from each turnbuckle post. They also criss-cross across the ring, kind of like this... _________ |________| |________| |________| |________| Wooden boards are then layed across these beams, and padding is put on top. These wooden boards aren't thick, they're thin plywood. The padding is quite thick, and if you ever see a diva standing in a ring with high heel shoes on you can see just how thick the padding is. If I can find an image in one of my old WOW magazines, I'll scan it in. Anyway, a canvas "sheet" is then layed over the padding and tightened intensely, as you can see with all those ropes they tie down to the steel beems when they lift up the curtains surrounding the ring. Then the ropes are joined, and walla, that's what a wrestling ring is. Interesting huh? No, not really? You already knew that? Well I'm sorry, I just wanted to spread wrestling knowledge for all those like me who previously had no idea how they were set up and what they were made out of. Leave me alone. |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Feb 4 2006, 07:12 AM Post #2 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
Personally, I figured out that the padding was fairly thick when guys in WCW such as Hogan and Scotty Riggs would wrestle in cowboy style boots. I always noticed that the heels of their boots would sink into the mat. At first, and I'll admit to being a mark here, I thought that the heels of the boots were just made of soft material to protect the other person if/when one would kick or dropkick. But then I saw them walking on the hard concrete and realized that their boots were fine and it was the mat that was sinking. But still, even with all that padding I'm sure repetitive bumping takes a toll on the wrestler's bodies. Also, anyone remember when they used to print stuff on the canvas? WCW used to do it often, either by printing the WCW logo on the canvas or printing the name of the PPV on the canvas. Now, you rarely ever see a wrestling ring with print on the canvas. The only time I see print on a ring canvas is if I'm watching CMLL. It's a shame too, because I always though that print added a little something visually to the ring, something that is currently missing. |
![]() |
|
| jackymatic | Feb 4 2006, 07:13 AM Post #3 |
![]()
He died for your sins
|
the tna wrestling ring looks retarded... but thats me |
![]() |
|
| Nubochanozep | Feb 4 2006, 07:28 AM Post #4 |
![]()
|
I tend to agree, but it does allow for some crazy irish whipping and springboard moves. I too loved the logos printed on the wrestling rings. I'd love to see the WWE doing it again these days. |
![]() |
|
| _DL_ | Feb 5 2006, 04:58 AM Post #5 |
![]()
BURN IT DOOOWWNNNNNNNN!
|
I like TNA's ring, it's innovative, and add to the X-Division. |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Feb 5 2006, 06:33 AM Post #6 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
TNA's ring is a nice alternative to the traditional square ring that many wrestling fans are used to, and it does help their product stand out, but I'd hardly call it innovative. It's nothing more than a smaller version of CMLL or AAA's 6 sided ring. |
![]() |
|
| Kraul | Feb 5 2006, 07:14 AM Post #7 |
|
I really like TNA's ring except for two things, one of which isn't really because of the ring. One, the ropes looks like crap. They look like WCW's ropes in that they are too solid and plastic looking. That just bothers me. I like how WWE's ropes are (actual ropes). And two, whenever I see the ring, I think of Jarrett standing in it either cutting a promo or winning a match and that is definately not a pleasurable thought for me. As for the logos on the canvas, I think it'd be awesome if that would show up in WWE. They could put logos on PPV canvas' to add to the special event feel. Also, when they cut up the canvas and sell the pieces, it could be more interesting if it was a cut out from a logo covered canvas. You could possibly figure out just where your piece came from if you had a piece with part of the logo on it. |
![]() |
|
| _DL_ | Feb 6 2006, 03:17 AM Post #8 |
![]()
BURN IT DOOOWWNNNNNNNN!
|
Oh, never saw their rings. |
![]() |
|
| TapOutAngleLock | Feb 17 2006, 01:36 AM Post #9 |
|
Ring Of Jankowski's Honor
|
The wwe ring is good its normal wrestling its a normal ring. I like tna but the ring i find very stupid six sides who the hell would wrestle with six sides. The only reason the ring is six sides is because is to be different. It would be so weird if the ring was three sides |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Feb 17 2006, 01:46 AM Post #10 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
The 6-sided ring has been around for decades and used by several wrestling companies, especially in Mexico. Both AAA and CMLL use the 6-sided ring, and I think a few Japanese companies use a similar ring as well. I don't follow the Japanese wrestling market as well as I should so I could be inaccurate there. But the point stands that the 6-sided ring is an accepted wrestling ring. It's new on the national U.S. market, but it suits TNA perfectly. My only complaint about TNA's ring is that it looks so small. I've been to indy shows with rings that looked bigger.
|
![]() |
|
| Nubochanozep | Feb 17 2006, 05:25 AM Post #11 |
![]()
|
Perhaps that's one of the reasons, but it sure as hell does allow for some more creative rope moves. It creates a sense of disorinetation, with wrestlers (especially in the X-Division) flying in diagonal directions constantly throughout the matches, it really does add a lot to the match, if used correctly. |
![]() |
|
| L69 | Feb 17 2006, 04:14 PM Post #12 |
![]()
|
The six sided rings would work in TNA if they debuted them in house shows but they changed it instantly. |
![]() |
|
| Nubochanozep | Dec 23 2007, 11:41 PM Post #13 |
![]()
|
Forgive me for bumping an old thread, but uh, meh. Has anyone but me noticed that the rings these days seem to bounce a whole lot less than they did when they were replaced in 1998? For comparison: Rock v Austin @ Wrestlemania 15 And uh, I guess anything on TV nowadays. Heh. So? Anyone agree? |
![]() |
|
| The Fallen Star | Dec 24 2007, 12:18 AM Post #14 |
![]()
I will find you.
|
Woah... how come your name still says Nebuchanezzar When you post here.. ![]() BTW, i've seen a wrestling ring being set-up from scratch, it took about half an hour, it is truly a fascinating thing! |
![]() |
|
| Kraul | Dec 24 2007, 12:28 AM Post #15 |
|
Ah! It does. I didn't know the lack of retro-active renaming or whatever Cy calles it worked that way.
|
![]() |
|
| Nubochanozep | Dec 24 2007, 02:27 AM Post #16 |
![]()
|
Answer my question! |
![]() |
|
| The Fallen Star | Dec 24 2007, 02:49 AM Post #17 |
![]()
I will find you.
|
Woah! Your Jimmy C now! Everyone look, he's Jimmy C now!
|
![]() |
|
| Kraul | Dec 24 2007, 03:04 AM Post #18 |
|
I still see him as Nebuchanezzar. ![]() An to answer the question, it doesn't seem much different to me. |
![]() |
|
| JD Storm | Dec 24 2007, 04:56 AM Post #19 |
![]()
McDonald's Heavyweight Champion
|
this isn't something i needed to see, while drinking. some of Nebbie's post show him as Nebucanezer (sp?). others have Jimmy C! dammit.....it's messing with me! |
![]() |
|
| WWEFootos48 | Dec 24 2007, 01:22 PM Post #20 |
![]()
God
|
Neb's back!!!!!11!~~!!!!11!!! But yeah, wrestling rings are cool. They really had to change them, though, especially after seeing that HIAC '98 match where Foley took that bump from the top of the cell into the ring. It had no give back then, and it could have seriously broken his back. But it's interesting to see how they are made. I really want to see how they set up the rest of the stuff, though, like the Titan Tron, lights, etc. I saw the "Making of RAW" special on Confidential, but I yearn for more! |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Dec 24 2007, 03:48 PM Post #21 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
Personally, I don't care about the ring bounciness. I think it should be flexible enough to offer some padding for the wrestler, but not so bouncy that it can blow out their knees as they run. Whatever bounciness it takes to achieve that balance is fine by me. ![]() As far as the lace of retroactive name changes, that's been explained several times. Yes. |
![]() |
|
| Nubochanozep | Dec 25 2007, 09:24 AM Post #22 |
![]()
|
Seems to me like they have very little give now. Although Sunday Night Heat the other day (we get it on TV) had exceptional bounciness. Cool that a thread like this got off topic and focused on me though. Happens a lot at forums I visit.
|
![]() |
|
| Kraul | Dec 25 2007, 09:12 PM Post #23 |
|
If they have less give now than they had, then that could be part of the reason why WWE constantly has multiple people on the injured list. I believe it was Foley that talked about how notoriously hard the WWF (at the time) ring was at the time (the Attitude era). If it's just gotten harder, then that's not good. |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Dec 25 2007, 09:37 PM Post #24 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
It was also Foley that talked about it being bad if the ring has too much give because a bouncy ring can lead to people blowing their knees out. |
![]() |
|
| Kraul | Dec 25 2007, 09:54 PM Post #25 |
|
Then that means only one thing: it's time to do away with rings altogether! It's time for WWE to whip out the big blue mats used in track for high jumps.
|
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Dec 25 2007, 09:58 PM Post #26 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
Does anyone know about the TNA ring? I honestly never pay attention to the bounciness of any ring, but I know it has more corners, which allows it to have more structural support. I wonder if that makes it a better ring to work on than the traditional four corner ring? |
![]() |
|
| Kraul | Dec 25 2007, 10:13 PM Post #27 |
|
I'd be curious to see one bare or get put together. It seems like it's be a lot more difficult to put together. |
![]() |
|
| Nubochanozep | Dec 26 2007, 09:26 AM Post #28 |
![]()
|
I always just assumed that was Foley bitching because his knees were in such bad shape. Those Attitude rings looked like fun though, given how much they bounced. Where's SavageRulz? What does it feel like to be slammed on one? |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Dec 26 2007, 12:27 PM Post #29 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
Perhaps, but how many people have gone out with knee related injuries? HBK has bad knees. Rey Mysterio went out with bad knees. Austin had both knees in knee braces. Triple H has torn both quads which are in the general area of the anatomy in question. Can these injuries be attributed to the WWE rings? I honestly cannot answer yes or no, but it is something to think about. |
![]() |
|
| WWEFootos48 | Dec 26 2007, 03:11 PM Post #30 |
![]()
God
|
To Neb: Actually, just thinking about it, I think it was Foley who mentioned in his (second) book that he was afraid of blowing out his knees due to the ring being all bouncy and stuff. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Wrestling · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2













7:28 PM Jul 11