| W E L C O M E G U E S T S Welcome to 6 Star Wrestling. We are a small community of dedicated wrestling fans. Our forum members range from new to the product to 20+ years of viewer knowledge of the product. We discuss WWE, TNA, ROH, WCW, and various other wrestling companies. Regardless if you have just watched your first wrestling show or if you have been following wrestling your entire life, I guarantee that you'll find someone to have an in-depth and enjoyable conversation with. We also have discussions that are not related to wrestling. We discuss movies, music, news, play games, and do all sorts of fun and interesting things. So even if you are not a wrestling fan, we can guarantee you'll find something to keep your interest while you are here. Feel free to follow us on Twitter and Like us on Facebook with the links below! Please enjoy, The 6 Star Community Register your free account today! http://6starwrestling.net http://twitter.com/6StarWrestling http://facebook.com/6StarWrestling |
| TNA Sucks | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jul 12 2006, 09:38 PM (1,040 Views) | |
| giddyfangurl206 | Jul 13 2006, 03:51 AM Post #31 |
![]()
Jeff Hardy's biggest fangurl!
|
If you watched RAW this Monday, you saw him hosting the Diva Search....he kept messing up his lines, and getting tongue tied...plus he couldn't even remember the number for the contest... |
![]() |
|
| Blazin' | Jul 13 2006, 03:53 AM Post #32 |
|
Can you feel the burn?
|
I did not see this weeks Raw I was not at my house I was on the road... In Jersey! |
![]() |
|
| giddyfangurl206 | Jul 13 2006, 04:00 AM Post #33 |
![]()
Jeff Hardy's biggest fangurl!
|
Well, then that is your fault.......... TNA just has better wrestling, plain and simple |
![]() |
|
| CWO | Jul 13 2006, 04:05 AM Post #34 |
![]()
^Priceless^
|
But that doesn't mean it has better overall quality though. WWE is still better than TNA in terms of Promos and Star Power, but TNA is better in terms of PPVs and Matches. Therefore, both WWE and TNA are equal in quality. So that means, one company is not better than the other. |
![]() |
|
| Blazin' | Jul 13 2006, 04:06 AM Post #35 |
|
Can you feel the burn?
|
Jumping of the Ropes all the time is not exactly wrestling jumping around like a bunch of pansies does not make you a Wrestler! |
![]() |
|
| giddyfangurl206 | Jul 13 2006, 04:10 AM Post #36 |
![]()
Jeff Hardy's biggest fangurl!
|
I don't hear you bragging about pulling all of those moves on a day to day basis.........I can do some of the wrestling moves shown in WWE...especially submissions (a lot of guys in my family) but I don't see anybody trying to pull off some of the moves in TNA..... Besides it isn't all about high flying moves. Have you seen The Canadian Destroyer, or the Styles Clash. Those are awesome finishers...and WWE has the FU, RKO, or the Spear... |
![]() |
|
| CWO | Jul 13 2006, 04:10 AM Post #37 |
![]()
^Priceless^
|
But you don't jump off the ropes all the time in TNA. Look at the Heavyweight Division, they're still in the same brand that the X Division is in, but they don't jump off the ropes all the time. |
![]() |
|
| Blazin' | Jul 13 2006, 04:12 AM Post #38 |
|
Can you feel the burn?
|
I mean like Light Heavyweights down... |
![]() |
|
| TheObserver | Jul 13 2006, 04:12 AM Post #39 |
|
Alright I have to jump in on this real quick, the reason WWE has as huge of a following as they have is cause they are have been around for over 20 years, TNA has be around for what........4, if people compare them to WWE, they must be doing something right. |
![]() |
|
| Blazin' | Jul 13 2006, 04:14 AM Post #40 |
|
Can you feel the burn?
|
Good Point.... Got me I'm done! |
![]() |
|
| giddyfangurl206 | Jul 13 2006, 04:16 AM Post #41 |
![]()
Jeff Hardy's biggest fangurl!
|
True....It takes alot to be compared to WWE, especially since TNA has only been on Spike TV for a few months, and FSN for........well that's when I started watching TNA... |
![]() |
|
| SRP76 | Jul 13 2006, 04:26 AM Post #42 |
![]()
The Man. Any Questions?
|
They are also the ONLY other company around of any real significance. Just because they're #2 by default doesn't put them on the same level, by any stretch of the imagination. If WCW was still out there, would TNA be well-known? Not a chance. Comparing the two on the basis of match quality, etc., isn't an exact science: Not ALL TNA matches are "great", by any means; not ALL WWE matches suck, either. Both have strong AND weak points in EVERY aspect of their promotions. |
![]() |
|
| giddyfangurl206 | Jul 13 2006, 04:27 AM Post #43 |
![]()
Jeff Hardy's biggest fangurl!
|
Actually, that made perfect sense..... |
![]() |
|
| TheObserver | Jul 13 2006, 04:29 AM Post #44 |
|
I guess it all depends on your own view of things. TNA has been doing good though in the little time they were around, that's all I was stating. But as I said, time and time again, I think the two can learn something from one another. |
![]() |
|
| SRP76 | Jul 13 2006, 04:54 AM Post #45 |
![]()
The Man. Any Questions?
|
Most certainly. Neither company can claim outright "untouchable" status in any one aspect of its promotion. I'm not a TNA fan, but I HAVE watched quite a bit. I really only have the one problem (that I mentioned before, somewhere): The "night-and-day" difference with the two divisions. X-Division is a breeding ground for stars. Even "heavyweights" like Joe, Styles, and others, are just transcended cruiserweights. They made their names in X-Division. The true heavyweight division, on the other hand, is populated mainly by recycled stars from other promotions. That can't happen. They DESPERATELY need a homegrown TRUE heavyweight to become the "face of the company". Unfortunately, when your promoter is also an active competitor, it makes it HARD to accomplish such a thing... |
![]() |
|
| giddyfangurl206 | Jul 13 2006, 04:57 AM Post #46 |
![]()
Jeff Hardy's biggest fangurl!
|
That is my only problem with TNA as well. I am getting fed up with the same guy having the title over, and over again....Although I do believe that TNA was the only way for Christian Cage to get as big as he is now... |
![]() |
|
| TheObserver | Jul 13 2006, 05:03 AM Post #47 |
|
Man, you know if we actually met in person, I think we'd be at it for days arguing about wrestling.
|
![]() |
|
| SRP76 | Jul 13 2006, 05:13 AM Post #48 |
![]()
The Man. Any Questions?
|
We do that anyway! I'll bet Pimp Lad has a stroke when he sees how many replies his thread got! |
![]() |
|
| TheObserver | Jul 13 2006, 05:17 AM Post #49 |
|
But of course. He probably did'nt think people would take this to the extent it has, but I could be wrong.....or not.
|
![]() |
|
| S-X2 | Jul 13 2006, 07:25 AM Post #50 |
|
"What an Excellent day for an Exorcism"
|
I'm not sure on how anybody can bash TNA it's awsome... you don't just get to see amazing wrestling talent and all new high risk moves and crazy matches you get to see wrestlers from the past as well as new fresh young talent... Ive thought of watching TNA over WWE many of times. so don't dig it dude TNA in my opinion is a impact on sports entertainment. |
![]() |
|
| WWEFootos48 | Jul 13 2006, 01:24 PM Post #51 |
![]()
God
|
The road in Jersey? Why would you stoop to such a low level? Anyway, according to the 6SW awards, I am the biggest WWE mark here, and I still think TNA is great! Of course, they have flaws, but you can't expect them to be perfect on the first shot. Being noticed this fast in such a short amount of time is already something within itself, and they will keep getting better. TNA delivers an "alternative" product. It does something WWE doesn't do, and give the fans what they want. Sure, they have the same guy as champion, but compared to John Cena, who is practically in the same situation, Jeff Jarret is God! The X-Division is the most exciting thing in wrestling right now. Off the top of my head, I could probably name 1 awesome match from every TNA PPV in the past year. They are innovators. Not to say WWE is bad, it's just TNA is "positively different." |
![]() |
|
| CWO | Jul 13 2006, 01:31 PM Post #52 |
![]()
^Priceless^
|
Couldn't say it better myself. But overall, like I said before, neither promotion is better than the other. One is better at the wrestling aspects, while one is better in the promos. So I really can't decide on who's the better wrestler. |
![]() |
|
| rapper150 | Jul 13 2006, 03:15 PM Post #53 |
|
I was also getting fed up with John Cena holding the title for a long time, so i was happy when he lost it at ECWONS and didn't get it back on Raw. |
![]() |
|
| Blazin' | Jul 13 2006, 03:18 PM Post #54 |
|
Can you feel the burn?
|
Me too... I like it with Edge better! |
![]() |
|
| S-X2 | Jul 13 2006, 03:20 PM Post #55 |
|
"What an Excellent day for an Exorcism"
|
A decent point there for sure, that being the boring feel of Cena holding the championship for the ammount of time he did, and of course regaining the title at the royal rumble earlier this year. TNA reaps the benefits of WWE on down days, just like i posted allready there has been times when i have "thought" of tuning into TNA over WWE, and i will say this for sure, if WCW was still a strong working brand, i'd choose that over WWE most of the time too. the new blood era ruled! |
![]() |
|
| Blazin' | Jul 13 2006, 03:42 PM Post #56 |
|
Can you feel the burn?
|
Tru Dat! |
![]() |
|
| TheObserver | Jul 13 2006, 04:13 PM Post #57 |
|
Well the thing about WWE is that they are huge up on gimmicks, who can cut a really good promo, they have some of the best wrestlers, it's just they don't utilize them the way they should, not saying they need to do it all the time, but they could do alot better than having Cena be their main champion for almost a year, while making Mysterio not seem like he's a worthy champion. Another thing is, Vince is huge up on big guys, history has shown this, TNA gives the wrestlers that are'nt as big, showing that they to can be useful, and not be a certain size to show how good they are, TNA has some of the best wrestlers in the world, so does WWE, but comparing the CW division to the X-division, is mixing apples and oranges. Maybe since the X-division is'nt just for guys under 6'0, but can have anyone in it, how many CW's can you say have held the IC or US title? Essentially, WWE use to be known for making stars, now it seems that they are'nt really for pushing anyone right now, the CW's get the bad end of it out of any division, well except for the women's which is just unmeaningful.
Alot of fans that watch TNA, compare it to WCW, just with less time given, if they were on 2 hours a week, then they could definetely be looked at as WCW in general, if Spike like Purps has mentioned would give them atleast 90 minutes, that's plenty of time to use the ones they don't put on each week, that and keep Jarrett off the tv, they'd have a better following then they have, but if you're a fan, then you're gonna tune in to see who is going to take the belt off him, just like those that tune into WWE to see who'll beat Cena when he was champion or it could be a different reasoning, but you put those two elements in Jarrett and Cena and the stars that you already have grown to love or whatever, and you whind up watching the shows, even though you may not want to. |
![]() |
|
| WWEFootos48 | Jul 13 2006, 04:25 PM Post #58 |
![]()
God
|
This is a good idea for a column. Give me a few, and i'll write a column about what I think about TNA. |
![]() |
|
| Superman8119 | Jul 13 2006, 07:06 PM Post #59 |
|
What This Person Needs To Realize. Is That TNA Probally Has Some Better Talent Than The WWE. Someday These TNA Stars Could Be WWE Stars. |
![]() |
|
| rickyx817 | Jul 18 2006, 04:45 AM Post #60 |
|
Ain't No Stoppin Me!
|
i like tna but i wish they would aire it at a better time, i ALWAYS forget to watch it.... |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Impact Wrestling · Next Topic » |









6:55 PM Jul 11