| W E L C O M E G U E S T S Welcome to 6 Star Wrestling. We are a small community of dedicated wrestling fans. Our forum members range from new to the product to 20+ years of viewer knowledge of the product. We discuss WWE, TNA, ROH, WCW, and various other wrestling companies. Regardless if you have just watched your first wrestling show or if you have been following wrestling your entire life, I guarantee that you'll find someone to have an in-depth and enjoyable conversation with. We also have discussions that are not related to wrestling. We discuss movies, music, news, play games, and do all sorts of fun and interesting things. So even if you are not a wrestling fan, we can guarantee you'll find something to keep your interest while you are here. Feel free to follow us on Twitter and Like us on Facebook with the links below! Please enjoy, The 6 Star Community Register your free account today! http://6starwrestling.net http://twitter.com/6StarWrestling http://facebook.com/6StarWrestling |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Survivor Series *Spoiler* | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Oct 10 2006, 11:07 PM (638 Views) | |
| TheObserver | Oct 10 2006, 11:07 PM Post #1 |
|
I guess in the coming weeks, I'll make this the official thread or something....
|
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Oct 10 2006, 11:39 PM Post #2 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
John Cena and DX aren't that much of a stretch since they teamed up already (although, they should comment more on the feud between Cena and Triple H from earlier this year). However, the SD! and ECW teams make it look like the GMs are going to force these teams, and even then it won't make full sense. |
![]() |
|
| _DL_ | Oct 10 2006, 11:41 PM Post #3 |
![]()
BURN IT DOOOWWNNNNNNNN!
|
Shot in the dark: I'll expect Edge and Orton to cost RAW the Match, if they're still/ or even going to fued with DX. |
![]() |
|
| Lionheart | Oct 11 2006, 12:02 AM Post #4 |
|
Heat Lifer
|
That wouldn't seem to far off. Seeing how the two teams will most likely face each other at Cyber Sunday (which is November 5th if I remember correctly) there still should be life in the feud. |
![]() |
|
| MY85 | Oct 11 2006, 12:04 AM Post #5 |
|
It's a fabulous new day, yes it is!
|
Rey Mysterio at SS? Isn't he supposed to get his knee surgery soon? |
![]() |
|
| TheObserver | Oct 13 2006, 12:26 AM Post #6 |
|
For anyone going.
|
![]() |
|
| Legacy | Oct 13 2006, 06:44 PM Post #7 |
![]()
snooooooooop
|
Yeah, and so is Shawn Michaels. |
![]() |
|
| Purple Marauder | Oct 13 2006, 07:05 PM Post #8 |
![]()
Stand Back! There's a Hurricane Coming Through
|
They are going to use the "Brand Loyality" bit that they always use. "Our guys may fight each other, but we will set aside that to prove our brand is better." |
![]() |
|
| Lionheart | Oct 13 2006, 08:13 PM Post #9 |
|
Heat Lifer
|
Being injured means nothing as long as they bring in the cash I guess
|
![]() |
|
| Legacy | Oct 13 2006, 08:15 PM Post #10 |
![]()
snooooooooop
|
Yeah, all Vince cares about is money. |
![]() |
|
| HHHKingOfKings | Oct 23 2006, 08:04 PM Post #11 |
|
Black Label Society #1
|
this would be an awsome main event for my personal favorite ppv of the year. |
![]() |
|
| MY85 | Oct 23 2006, 08:16 PM Post #12 |
|
It's a fabulous new day, yes it is!
|
Now that Rey Mysterio's out of the WWE picture for now, is Bobby Lashley or Kennedy or somebody else going to take his place at Survivor Series? It's a given that Batista and Booker would be main-eventiing if the spoiler was true. |
![]() |
|
| Kame | Oct 26 2006, 07:04 PM Post #13 |
|
Lashley will take Mysterio's spot. No question about it. |
![]() |
|
| Lionheart | Oct 26 2006, 07:35 PM Post #14 |
|
Heat Lifer
|
It probably will be Lashley since Kennedy is fueding with Taker. |
![]() |
|
| _DL_ | Oct 27 2006, 03:21 AM Post #15 |
![]()
BURN IT DOOOWWNNNNNNNN!
|
Found it funny. http://www.wwe.com/subscriptions/247online/wcw/ |
![]() |
|
| 15 Shows | Oct 27 2006, 03:42 AM Post #16 |
|
Aint cheatin aint tryin
|
I think Triple H was trying to reflect on that fued when they teamed up. If you watch when DX was announced to team with Cena, Triple H walked up beside Cena, looking at him in a weird way, NO not that way. But Cena didn't realize what he was doing and just nodded the like dumb shit he is. |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Nov 6 2006, 08:43 PM Post #17 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
|
![]() |
|
| WWEFootos48 | Nov 6 2006, 08:49 PM Post #18 |
![]()
God
|
Wow, that's a first. They don't fill the card up until the Show, or even the day before the PPV, now they're doing it the first week after a PPV? I can't complain, really. Although, it could also be regarded as a stupid move. The way I see it, is they should create rivalries, then announce the matches, and not create the matches, and start a rivalry.
|
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Nov 6 2006, 08:55 PM Post #19 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
I like this approach much better and hope they do it more often, although, I have a feeling that the fact that they only have 3 weeks to build, hype, and sell this PPV may have something to do with this new booking approach. |
![]() |
|
| _DL_ | Nov 6 2006, 08:56 PM Post #20 |
![]()
BURN IT DOOOWWNNNNNNNN!
|
I think WWE is out of ideas at this point. |
![]() |
|
| WWEFootos48 | Nov 6 2006, 08:58 PM Post #21 |
![]()
God
|
I think it depends on what matches they'll book. If they go by this, realistically, it'll have to be encased in some type of feud, (D-X vs. Rated RKO, Classic Survivor Series RAW vs. SD! vs. ECW, etc.) because if it's a match with two people who you wouldn't expect to face eachother, it just makes it lazy booking. |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Nov 6 2006, 09:08 PM Post #22 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
I disagree. Lazy booking is when they just throw a match together for no apparent reason and put it on a PPV. An example of that would be the 4 team tag match that happened at Cyber Sunday. They didn't even announce the match until after the final Raw before the PPV. That was lazy booking. However, if they pit two people that have no real feud against each other, then it creates a reason to feud. They may not have beef with each other, but they are booked against each other, which will force them to interact with each other, which makes the match look more appealing, which potentially drives buyrates. TNA uses a similar booking strategy. TNA books most of their PPVs on their first taping after the PPV and their PPVs blow WWE PPVs out of the water almost every month. |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Nov 6 2006, 09:28 PM Post #23 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
An official discussion thread will be made after the first match is actually announced. |
![]() |
|
| WWEFootos48 | Nov 6 2006, 09:35 PM Post #24 |
![]()
God
|
I guess it's just our differences, but that's exactly what i'm talking about. Putting a match together, with opponents that have no reason, or backing behind it. Even if it has a few weeks to build up, it's still working backwards, which is a very risky move. I've always liked the fact, that WWE (even if it was the stupidest of bouts, or even if it was announced few days before the PPV) always worked with the storyline first, then announcement of the match. I don't know, though. I've been complaining about WWE enough recently, so i'll just wait until the matches are announced first, then complain. |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Nov 6 2006, 09:52 PM Post #25 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
If two people have absolutely no reason to feud, then it makes more sense for them to start feuding because they are booked in a match than it does for one of them to attack the other for no logical reason and then request a match to be booked. |
![]() |
|
| MY85 | Nov 7 2006, 05:13 PM Post #26 |
|
It's a fabulous new day, yes it is!
|
According to the Smackdown spoilers for this Friday, I bet the following matches might get announced at WWE.com: -Undertaker vs Mister Kennedy -Chris Benoit vs Chavo Guerrero -King Booker vs Batista |
![]() |
|
| Terrible Fry | Nov 7 2006, 05:18 PM Post #27 |
![]()
|
I wonder if they are still going to go through with the Raw vs Smackdown vs ECW match. If so who would represent Smackdown? |
![]() |
|
| _DL_ | Nov 7 2006, 06:46 PM Post #28 |
![]()
BURN IT DOOOWWNNNNNNNN!
|
Hmm, if King Booker and Batista are already in a match together, then it may not be a brand vs. brand vs. brand. Unless they have them wrestling twice, which is unlikely. So, most likely there won't be King Booker vs Batista, since from the Armageddon poster Batista will get his shot at that PPV. |
![]() |
|
| MY85 | Nov 7 2006, 07:11 PM Post #29 |
|
It's a fabulous new day, yes it is!
|
If Booker, Batista, Benoit, Chavo, Undertaker and Kennedy are already occupied... Smackdown still has wrestlers for the Brand match. I think the Brand match will be having a mix of former Main Eventers and Mid-Carders there. As for Smackdown, then can put Kane, Matt Hardy, Finlay, Lashley and Helms. I think Raw and ECW will have title matches, assuming Cena faces Umaga and DX faces Rated RKO and Big Show maybe faces RVD at SS or they along with Sabu, Test and CM Punk become a part of the Brand match. Does anyone know how many people will it be at the Brand match? |
![]() |
|
| Terrible Fry | Nov 7 2006, 07:16 PM Post #30 |
![]()
|
I'm pretty sure it was announced that it will be three superstars per brand. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · WWE · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2









8:52 AM Jul 11