| W E L C O M E G U E S T S Welcome to 6 Star Wrestling. We are a small community of dedicated wrestling fans. Our forum members range from new to the product to 20+ years of viewer knowledge of the product. We discuss WWE, TNA, ROH, WCW, and various other wrestling companies. Regardless if you have just watched your first wrestling show or if you have been following wrestling your entire life, I guarantee that you'll find someone to have an in-depth and enjoyable conversation with. We also have discussions that are not related to wrestling. We discuss movies, music, news, play games, and do all sorts of fun and interesting things. So even if you are not a wrestling fan, we can guarantee you'll find something to keep your interest while you are here. Feel free to follow us on Twitter and Like us on Facebook with the links below! Please enjoy, The 6 Star Community Register your free account today! http://6starwrestling.net http://twitter.com/6StarWrestling http://facebook.com/6StarWrestling |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Raw Discussion 11-6-06 | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 6 2006, 10:17 PM (930 Views) | |
| 15 Shows | Nov 7 2006, 09:37 PM Post #31 |
|
Aint cheatin aint tryin
|
I don't really have to prove anything. RAW has better ratings so what do I care. Im not trying to debate which is better. I just said I like RAW better. You asked why and I told you. But now my reason is not good enough because according to you guys it's wrong. Well too god damn bad. I like RAW better. So it is better. And you like TNA better so it is better. That's the end of that. But just to humor you, I'll watch Impact every week from here on out, and deliver a full report of what I liked and didn't like throughout the entire episode. |
![]() |
|
| _DL_ | Nov 7 2006, 09:38 PM Post #32 |
![]()
BURN IT DOOOWWNNNNNNNN!
|
Better ratings mean nothing, look at the current time slots. |
![]() |
|
| WWEFootos48 | Nov 7 2006, 09:40 PM Post #33 |
![]()
God
|
We're not saying that we hate your opinion on RAW. All you're doing is putting over RAW, and throwing out every single thing another brand/Company has done. You've given bad examples of why "TNA Sucks," and they just don't work for me. Unless you have a Super High-Definition TV set in Canada, I don't think what we see on our Television sets could be THAT much different. |
![]() |
|
| 15 Shows | Nov 7 2006, 09:41 PM Post #34 |
|
Aint cheatin aint tryin
|
Umm if RAW moved to the timeslot TNA had it would have better ratings. It's up against the ratings juggernaught, Monday Night Football. I dont think WWE has an advantage via timeslot. |
![]() |
|
| _DL_ | Nov 7 2006, 09:42 PM Post #35 |
![]()
BURN IT DOOOWWNNNNNNNN!
|
I'm not talking about MNF. Regardless of MNF. RAW is on a 9pm, and TNA is on at 11pm. |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Nov 7 2006, 09:42 PM Post #36 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
Firstly, ratings prove popularity not quality. A few years ago the boy bands of the word were selling the most CDs and dominating the charts. They were popular at the time. They had a strong following. But no one today looks back and says that the boy bands delivered quality or that they were actually good. I'm definitely not comparing WWE to boy bands, but the main point remains the same. Just because WWE is more popular than TNA doesn't necessarily make it the better show.
So for all these weeks whenever someone pointed out reasons they didn't like Raw, then it was fine for you to counter argue. But when you point out something you don't like about TNA (or SD!), then the same people shouldn't counter argue your points? Very odd. |
![]() |
|
| WWEFootos48 | Nov 7 2006, 09:43 PM Post #37 |
![]()
God
|
RAW is an established program, and TNA isn't. Of course, more people will know WWE Programming, than TNA. If TNA was in RAW's timeslot, and was running for over 13 years, I believe it would be getting the same, or even better ratings. As Vince McMahon said on the Monday Night Wars DVD, "The ratings mean nothing." |
![]() |
|
| 15 Shows | Nov 7 2006, 09:43 PM Post #38 |
|
Aint cheatin aint tryin
|
I don't think I said TNA sucks. I said I like RAW better. And I told why god dammit. What more do you want. RAW may have more botches but only because it's live. In the 2 TNA PPV's I watched there were plenty of lets say...not so smooth manuevers. And god damn I know Im right about the interference thing. |
![]() |
|
| 15 Shows | Nov 7 2006, 09:46 PM Post #39 |
|
Aint cheatin aint tryin
|
I don't think it was counter arguments as much as me simply saying I liked what they didnt like. |
![]() |
|
| WWEFootos48 | Nov 7 2006, 09:49 PM Post #40 |
![]()
God
|
Alright, fine. You don't think TNA sucks. However, you're really doing a great job of putting RAW over! Again, I know it's all perception, but your arguments as to why RAW is better, especially using the ratings as an excuse, is bothering me. If you want to go this way, you can look back 6 years ago, when RAW was getting nearly twice the number they're getting today. |
![]() |
|
| 15 Shows | Nov 7 2006, 09:52 PM Post #41 |
|
Aint cheatin aint tryin
|
Why thankyou sweety. I beleive I said I don't really care after my ratings statement. I never said it was better because of ratings. Im just simply saying, you may like it better but, more people agree with me so HA! |
![]() |
|
| MY85 | Nov 8 2006, 03:03 AM Post #42 |
|
It's a fabulous new day, yes it is!
|
Hmmm.... this is funny. Because like everyone else said, you put Raw over any other wrestling show or company. I've seen you claiming that Smackdown is a shitty worthless brand with not much good excuses to back up your statement. And you claim that you don't watch Smackdown. Yet, when people like Junkie and I said we didn't watched much of Raw, you come up with this:
That's just funny. Because we don't watch Raw and criticize it, you tell us not to criticize it until we watch it. |
![]() |
|
| 15 Shows | Nov 8 2006, 03:27 AM Post #43 |
|
Aint cheatin aint tryin
|
Call me stupid but this confused me. And I dont think I called Smackdown shitty and worthless. I know I have said RAW is better. Because I think RAW is better. And if I did say Smackdown was worthless and shitty it was when I did watch it. And that was around the time ECW came back. And at the time I thought it was worthless and shitty. I dont know about now and so I wont give an opinion except for that I think RAW is better I can say that if I feel like saying that. You reveiws on RAW and jumped up and said it was shitty without even watching it. Therefore I told you to watch it first. I though it was a great RAW, with Bishoff reaking havoc as GM. I like when he makes commentators and announcer face big people. It may not be a great wrestling match but, for me, it was good entertainment. Oh and I watched it. |
![]() |
|
| MY85 | Nov 8 2006, 03:31 AM Post #44 |
|
It's a fabulous new day, yes it is!
|
My bad. Just in case, I fixed it.
Oh, and since that time you claimed to watch Smackdown around the time ECW returned, I'll agree Raw was better around June and a bit of July. But then, Smackdown has improved in show quality, but the ratings really started to improve once it got aired on the CW due to UPN not airing in other states across the USA. But I'll tell you that things have changed at Smackdown after June-July. |
![]() |
|
| 15 Shows | Nov 8 2006, 03:35 AM Post #45 |
|
Aint cheatin aint tryin
|
Well good for Smackdown. But my favorite wrestlers are in order 1. Triple H 2. Edge 3. Carlito 4. Randy Orton 5. Kurt Angle 6. Booker T 7. Kane 8. Shelton Benjamen 9. Test 10. Big Show. Hmm 2 Smackdown guys. I dont feel the urge to watch it. |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Nov 8 2006, 03:40 AM Post #46 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
Then don't watch it if it doesn't appeal to you. No one says you have to. But at the same time, you aren't exactly in a position to say how Raw is superior to SmackDown! And has anyone else noticed how Raw discussion threads always go off the topic of the relevant week's Raw and move onto a more general wrestling discussion? Every damn week. |
![]() |
|
| 15 Shows | Nov 8 2006, 03:44 AM Post #47 |
|
Aint cheatin aint tryin
|
Read my last post homeslice. I think I tried to get back on topic of the current RAW episode. I won't watch it. And I'll saying what I have been saying all day. I have not said what is better then what for some time now. And If I do I always add, for me, to me, my opinion around that comment. |
![]() |
|
| _DL_ | Nov 8 2006, 03:45 AM Post #48 |
![]()
BURN IT DOOOWWNNNNNNNN!
|
*Gone* |
![]() |
|
| _DL_ | Nov 8 2006, 03:45 AM Post #49 |
![]()
BURN IT DOOOWWNNNNNNNN!
|
Well, there's nothing worth talking about RAW. |
![]() |
|
| jackymatic | Nov 8 2006, 05:00 AM Post #50 |
![]()
He died for your sins
|
agreed That's the thing I love about it The X Division owns the intercontinental division anyday If only wwe pushed the intercontinental divion to its true untapped potential oh well |
![]() |
|
| Nubochanozep | Nov 8 2006, 09:48 AM Post #51 |
![]()
|
God, that was awful. Thooughts:
I stopped watching before the last half hour, so maybe I missed out on the entertaining parts to the show like DX...if they showed up. Awful - 3/10 |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Nov 8 2006, 08:24 PM Post #52 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
Well, that just neutralized everyone's complaints about the quality of the show being extremely bad. As long as the ratings don't drop, then Vince has no reason to think that his product wasn't good. More of this crap in the future.
|
![]() |
|
| _DL_ | Nov 8 2006, 08:46 PM Post #53 |
![]()
BURN IT DOOOWWNNNNNNNN!
|
People already knew the outcome of the MNF game, so it's understandable for it's drop in ratings. |
![]() |
|
| 4400TVJunkie | Nov 8 2006, 09:28 PM Post #54 |
![]()
All hail King Booker!
|
RAW lucked out because of the shitty MNF. |
![]() |
|
| _DL_ | Nov 8 2006, 09:32 PM Post #55 |
![]()
BURN IT DOOOWWNNNNNNNN!
|
And now, the Raiders have screwed us all! |
![]() |
|
| Lionheart | Nov 8 2006, 09:38 PM Post #56 |
|
Heat Lifer
|
Quite surprising seeing how much Raw sucked tonight. I seriously think this was the worst Raw of the year. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
|
|
| « Previous Topic · WWE · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2










8:52 AM Jul 11