Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
W E L C O M E      G U E S T S

Welcome to 6 Star Wrestling. We are a small community of dedicated wrestling fans. Our forum members range from new to the product to 20+ years of viewer knowledge of the product.

We discuss WWE, TNA, ROH, WCW, and various other wrestling companies. Regardless if you have just watched your first wrestling show or if you have been following wrestling your entire life, I guarantee that you'll find someone to have an in-depth and enjoyable conversation with.

We also have discussions that are not related to wrestling. We discuss movies, music, news, play games, and do all sorts of fun and interesting things. So even if you are not a wrestling fan, we can guarantee you'll find something to keep your interest while you are here.

Feel free to follow us on Twitter and Like us on Facebook with the links below!

Please enjoy,
The 6 Star Community

Register your free account today!

http://6starwrestling.net

http://twitter.com/6StarWrestling

http://facebook.com/6StarWrestling

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
A Skeptical Look At Christianity
Topic Started: Jan 31 2007, 08:13 AM (527 Views)
J.J.S.

But The Undertaker's wrestling skill would be disputed (or defended) if someone came in and said that HBK wasn't as talented as he was. Kind of like if somebody came into a religion thread and posted this:

Quote:
 
If I know anything about physics, and I do, it's that it's absolutely impossible for an entity to not exist...but exist.  Your soul doesn't exist, it's an entity made up by potheads of 2000 years prior. There's no St. Peter at the Pearly Gates, because there aren't any Pearly Gates. If this so called heaven actually exists, we would have seen it. What's that? It's invisible to us? It's too far away? Man, that's convinient, ain't it?


What did you expect? Of course someone is going to mention science if science is brought up.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nubochanozep
Member Avatar

Oh FFS, I don't care. Ok, fine, whatever, I really don't care about the logistics of bringing something about science up in an argument that much, that's why I've been trying to steer it back towards anything more interesting - religion, science v religion, the existence of God, anything.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
J.J.S.

I'm pretty sure that discussing the likelihood of the Big Bang falls squarely into the "science vs. religion" category. Or are we only allowed to bring such things up if they're to be used as evidence against God's existence?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nubochanozep
Member Avatar

^Correct :P

But as I said before, challenging the validity of one single theory which is widely accepted to be one of the most wild in all of science hardly speaks volumes in the science v religion debate.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · The Thunderdome · Next Topic »
Add Reply