Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
W E L C O M E      G U E S T S

Welcome to 6 Star Wrestling. We are a small community of dedicated wrestling fans. Our forum members range from new to the product to 20+ years of viewer knowledge of the product.

We discuss WWE, TNA, ROH, WCW, and various other wrestling companies. Regardless if you have just watched your first wrestling show or if you have been following wrestling your entire life, I guarantee that you'll find someone to have an in-depth and enjoyable conversation with.

We also have discussions that are not related to wrestling. We discuss movies, music, news, play games, and do all sorts of fun and interesting things. So even if you are not a wrestling fan, we can guarantee you'll find something to keep your interest while you are here.

Feel free to follow us on Twitter and Like us on Facebook with the links below!

Please enjoy,
The 6 Star Community

Register your free account today!

http://6starwrestling.net

http://twitter.com/6StarWrestling

http://facebook.com/6StarWrestling

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
FacFic - November 15
Topic Started: Nov 15 2007, 09:08 AM (196 Views)
Cybrus
Member Avatar
STAY HYPED!!!
These threads don't exactly stimulate conversation or anything, but I'll follow through with it for another week. The last two players (Jimmylord & Jknight253) are not edible to play, but everyone else is. The first two to respond in this thread wanting to participate will receive the five questions.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TapOutAngleLock
Member Avatar
Ring Of Jankowski's Honor
I want to play
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jknight253
Member Avatar

Cybrus
Nov 15 2007, 09:08 AM
(Jimmylord & Jknight253) are not edible

Phew I don't want to be eaten :P
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kame

I guess I'll play, too.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Cybrus
Member Avatar
STAY HYPED!!!
Quote:
 
1. WWE should keep the Survivor Series PPV true to its roots by featuring mostly "traditional elimination matches" with only one or two title matches being single matches.

TapOutAngleLock - FACT
:spacer: WWE should keep the Survior Series PPV true by its roots and only have one singles matcha and rest survivor matches. The single match would either be for the RAW or SD title, which one ever has the better feud at the time. The idea I had for SS, was a red robin tourney with 5 ECW wrestlers, 5 SD wrestlers, and 5 Raw wrestlers. You would have ECW vs SD in beginning of show, Raw vs ECW middle of show, and Raw vs SD at the end of show. And it would be cool to see your maineventers wrestle twice in one night and it would give a chance to the ECW guys to shine.Then I would have 5 divas on Raw vs 5 divas from ECW and SD. So thats 5 matches right there. Then I would have Raw tag team division vs SD tag team division in survivor match, 6 matches now. Then who ever is left on the roster you would have the 10 best also in a survior match, theres 7 matches. I just think that would get people intersted the whole Raw vs SD vs ECW.

Kametsou - FACT
:spacer: I've never been a fan of Survivor Series and I doubt I ever will be, but the whole purpose of it originally was for elimination matches. If they're going to have one elimination match on the entire SS card from now on, then I think it's time for a name change or maybe they should just drop the pay-per-view completely.


Agreed 1 out of 1

Quote:
 
2. TNA should not be hiring people released from WWE due to drug violations regardless of the performer's name brand status.

TapOutAngleLock - FICTION
:spacer: TNA needs all the help possible, I mean the show is dreadful to watch. Yes we want the wrestlers to stay healthy, but once you leave the WWE your in the independant circuit and looking to get a paycheck and one day get into the wwe, if that means juicing it up to help yourself in TNA to get into the WWE again then so be it. But right now TNA needs all the help they can get, the more big names the better gets them more exposure and more audience.

Kametsou - FACT
:spacer: By doing this, TNA's making wrestling look shitty. No, not just the WWE, the entire world of wrestling. When people fail a drug test, then they're supposed to be punished, not rewarded.


Agreed 1 out of 2

Quote:
 
3. Kaz could be a big name talent for TNA if they'd push him as one.

TapOutAngleLock - FICTION
:spacer: Kaz becoming a big name talent could never happen. I mean look at Kaz he is dull as dishwater. Yes the man can wrestle a little bit, but he has no drama effect in matches the fans do not care about him. I mean if Kaz ever main events a PPV might as well flush TNA down the toilet. Kaz beat Cage in Cage's own match what did that do? Kaz winning did not help him at all, all the match did was hurt christian alot. Kaz will never become a big name talent in TNA even if they do force him down our throats.

Kametsou - FACT
:spacer: Over the past couple of months, Kaz has become one of my favorite wrestlers in TNA. His last couple of matches have been over the three-star limit, which is fantastic. They pushed Styles up to the main-event a couple of times, so why not do it to Kaz?


Agreed 1 out of 3

Quote:
 
4. Since Cena left WWE, Orton has been carrying around a similar title only it doesn't spin.  WWE should keep this design (the one Orton has) and should not re-design the title.

TapOutAngleLock - FACT
:spacer: I could care less if the belt spins or if doesn't spin. But I think WWE should keep this desing and should not re-design the title because its their biggest selling belt at the merchandise table. Why would you stop the spinner belt if its brining in you a bunch of money. I think WWE should keep the spinnning belt.

Kametsou - FICTION
:spacer: Every time I look at the current WWE Championship design, I can't help but not to think of John Cena. I'd love to see it go back to the Undisputed Championship design, but I highly doubt that's going to happen anytime soon.


Agreed 1 out of 4

Quote:
 

5. Of the three World Champions (Orton, Punk, Batista), Batista is currently the best champion.


TapOutAngleLock - FICTION
:spacer: Who ever is on RAW is usually the best champ, and in that case that facts state the truth. Randy Orton is the best champ out himself Punk and HHH butt kisser, sorry I meant Batista. As much as I want to say CM Punk the only person he has beaten is Johnny Nitro/Morrison and the heat he gets is very small compared to RKOs. Batista as champ is almost as bad as Khali or Rey as champ. I mean Batista matches are slow and boring, Edge could not even get a good match out of him, Booker T could not even get a goot match out him, Taker and HHH are the only people to get a good title match out of him. And to have a good champion he has to be able to wrestle a bit and Batista can. So basically by default Orton is the best champ, but RKO having the belt is not as good as Cena holding the belt. People were either loving Cena having the belt or beggin anyone to beat him even if it a meant a super hated heel, there was somethins special about Cena's title hold and I miss it.

Kametsou - FACT
:spacer: As much as I don't like to say it, it's the absolute truth. Starting with Orton, whenever I see him walking to the ring, I just can't imagine him as the WWE Champion. All he looks like to me is a man who happens to have a championship belt. He doesn't have that drive that a champion's supposed to have. As many of you may know, Punk's my favorite wrestler right now, but I don't think he's made a great champion thus far. I don't blame it solemnly on him, though because the WWE writers have thrown the same guys at him for the past few months: Morrison, Miz and Big Daddy V. If they put him against someone like Dreamer or Stevie, then I'd probably have to reconsider. Now, when I see Batista, I see a champion. He's not the greatest wrestler, but when he wants to do well, he's one of the best powerhouses out there. His matches against Undertaker have been classics and I'll remember them for as long as I live. End of discussion.


Agreed 1 out of 5

---------

These two definitely have contrasting views when it comes to the wrestling we all watch. They only agreed on one statement. Just one.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TapOutAngleLock
Member Avatar
Ring Of Jankowski's Honor
Man Kametsou and I usually agree on a lot of things about wrestling, but from here we can tell we have completely different views on the sport.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Purple Marauder
Member Avatar
Stand Back! There's a Hurricane Coming Through
1. WWE should keep the Survivor Series PPV true to its roots by featuring mostly "traditional elimination matches" with only one or two title matches being single matches.

FICTION.
Although in the beginning, they matches were unique, the WWF at the time, actually built up reasons and stories for these matches. Now, they simply try to throw 10 guys or girls in a match. The WWE doesn't have the creativity nor enough true start power to fill up a good "Old Fashioned" SS card. One or two per PPV is all that is needed these days.

2. TNA should not be hiring people released from WWE due to drug violations regardless of the performer's name brand status.

FICTION.
As I stated in another thread, TNA is trying to build a company. And, if everyone knows what they are getting into from the get go, I say hire them if they will help the company. TNA must either protect itself or be willing to pay the price for anything that comes from making that decision, but I'd hire Booker T and RVD knowing they smoke weed. TNA just need to make sure the wrestlers they hire are worth the risk.

3. Kaz could be a big name talent for TNA if they'd push him as one.

FICTION.
Kaz is an awesome in ring wrestler, but he is seriously lacking in the charisma department. He would make a good X-Division wrestler or Tag Team wrestler if teamed with the right guy. But, I can't see him as a main event wrestler in TNA. When I look at him, I see Billy Kidman.


4. Since Cena left WWE, Orton has been carrying around a similar title only it doesn't spin. WWE should keep this design (the one Orton has) and should not re-design the title.

FICTION.
I really have a problem with the spinning title and, to tell the truth, I didn't even notice that it doesn't spin anymore. I do , however, think that it should be redesigned. To me, the current design was made for John Cena. It is like his "Smoking Skull" belt. The Cena era is over. A new belt should be made. I would want one that is more generic, as in anyone can wear. Like The current World title or and Older WWE/F title used to be.

5. Of the three World Champions (Orton, Punk, Batista), Batista is currently the best champion.

FACT.(kind of)
This answer depends on what your definition of "Best" is. Batista is the most famous/popular of the three champions. He would be the most marketable of the 3 champions in the WWE's eyes. But, if you want the best in ring guy, both Punk and Orton are better. The problem with all 3 guys is that each has a weakness. Orton holds the WWE's most important title, but isn't polished in the ring and is weak on the mic in my opinion. Punk, holds the weakest of the "world" titles. He isn't as well known and hasn't wrestled any top WWE competition. Batista is terrible in the ring and thinks he is cooler on the mic than he is. But, he is the bigger name as of now.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · General Wrestling · Next Topic »
Add Reply