| W E L C O M E G U E S T S Welcome to 6 Star Wrestling. We are a small community of dedicated wrestling fans. Our forum members range from new to the product to 20+ years of viewer knowledge of the product. We discuss WWE, TNA, ROH, WCW, and various other wrestling companies. Regardless if you have just watched your first wrestling show or if you have been following wrestling your entire life, I guarantee that you'll find someone to have an in-depth and enjoyable conversation with. We also have discussions that are not related to wrestling. We discuss movies, music, news, play games, and do all sorts of fun and interesting things. So even if you are not a wrestling fan, we can guarantee you'll find something to keep your interest while you are here. Feel free to follow us on Twitter and Like us on Facebook with the links below! Please enjoy, The 6 Star Community Register your free account today! http://6starwrestling.net http://twitter.com/6StarWrestling http://facebook.com/6StarWrestling |
| Jim Cornette rips Monday Night Battle | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jan 6 2010, 01:49 PM (335 Views) | |
| Cybrus | Jan 6 2010, 01:49 PM Post #1 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
Solid point in that no new name was really highlighted outside of AJ Styles. Monday Night was a fun night from TNA. I enjoyed it splendidly. However, lets hope they are true to their word and focus on highlighting younger talent. |
![]() |
|
| Nubochanozep | Jan 7 2010, 01:24 AM Post #2 |
![]()
|
Jim Cornette is right - let's hope it doesn't become nWo 8.7 |
![]() |
|
| danmnz | Jan 14 2010, 01:08 PM Post #3 |
|
They can use the nWo as a side story, and basically have new guys rip them apart from time to time to make their names more known. Hell, wasn't Goldberg big for doing that? |
![]() |
|
| Nubochanozep | Jan 14 2010, 10:37 PM Post #4 |
![]()
|
Goldberg was as entrenched in that nWo saga as much as anyone else was even though he wasn't a member. |
![]() |
|
| WWEFootos48 | Jan 15 2010, 12:27 AM Post #5 |
![]()
God
|
I'm not going to disagree with Cornette, but I'm not going to agree with him at this point either. I felt the January 4th shows (most notably from about 8:55-9:20) was some of the most exciting wrestling stuff I have ever seen, because of the build-up and content. I mean I'm trying to think of all of the '97-'10 comparisons and totally agree that they are basically the same, but I don't think TNA could have done anything differently in trying to gain viewers. It's not like WWE has that one star today that would pull viewers from WWE to TNA like Hogan (or Hogan turning heel from face) did with WCW. I mean if Rock or Austin jumped to WCW back in the day I think the ultimate battle would have gone a different route, but I just don't think there's that one "impact" guy who can do the same today unless you re-create history like TNA is doing now. So yeah, Cornette isn't wrong by saying what he did, but I mean if TNA wanted to make a real name for themselves, they didn't have many other options than do what they did. But hey, if they highlight Styles and Angle for every main event and PPV, I don't see how they can lose.
Edited by WWEFootos48, Jan 15 2010, 12:27 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Nubochanozep | Jan 15 2010, 09:50 AM Post #6 |
![]()
|
They had plenty of other options. WCW made a name by capturing stars of the day, rather than stars of two decades ago. If they wanted to go along the WCW route they'd have made a large fanfare out of Jeff Hardy's arrival and the large amount of WWE superstars they have working for them now - not that a fat Scott Hall, a suicidal Hulk Hogan and a pathetic looking XPac showed up. |
![]() |
|
| WWEFootos48 | Jan 15 2010, 08:37 PM Post #7 |
![]()
God
|
Yeah, but my point is somebody like Hardy doesn't cause an impact. The biggest star that WCW made out of the era that wasn't one of those old guys like Hogan or Hall or Nash coming from the WWF was Goldberg. That's really it. Benoit, Guerrero, Jericho, etc., were well remembered by fans, but they weren't the sole reason people tuned in. Someone like Hardy won't make people go "OH SHIT! LET'S WATCH THAT SHOW BECAUSE THEY'RE 4 REAL!" TNA would have probably gotten below average ratings on the show if they hyped Hardy over Hogan because although he's popular by WWE standards, he just doesn't have that draw someone like Hogan does. |
![]() |
|
| Nubochanozep | Jan 15 2010, 11:47 PM Post #8 |
![]()
|
alone i think you're right about hardy. if you lump him with some other current talent i'd say you're wrong and that they could draw as many as hogan could. and in any case, it's far better for the long term. |
![]() |
|
| WWEFootos48 | Jan 15 2010, 11:58 PM Post #9 |
![]()
God
|
I agree it would be better for the long-term, but I mean who exactly are you talking about? Bring a package of Cena, Orton and Triple H to TNA? That would take a chunk out of WWE's audience, but is that really plausable? |
![]() |
|
| Nubochanozep | Jan 16 2010, 01:35 AM Post #10 |
![]()
|
hardy, angle and christian have already been there - three former wwe champion...ship contenders. it's not a stretch. and i firmly believe having these old dinosaurs there in any major capacity for a long term is going to hurt TNA more than it will benefit them - nobody wants to see these old codgers unless they're involved in something completely new (which they're not). |
![]() |
|
| Cybrus | Jan 16 2010, 10:33 AM Post #11 |
|
STAY HYPED!!!
|
Whereas I disagreed with calling Triple H and HBK obsolete dinosaurs since they both can deliver on the mic and in the ring, I do agree that Hall, Nash, Hogan, the Nasty Boys, and almost everyone else TNA brought in on January 4 are dinosaurs that need to leave the spotlight. These guys cannot work a match and, as seen on January 4, they are still under the assumption that it is 1997, TNA is WCW, and they are all in their primes. That's not the case. Their involvement did get people talking. I've talked about TNA at work before and the wrestling fans said they hated it. Now, they are all watching it because Hogan and co came in. So the interest is there. But they are not going to keep the interest unless they develop younger guys. Also, I disagree Jeff Hardy not being a big impact player. He was the most popular act in WWE. Nobody was more popular than Jeff Hardy. Nobody. The guy got rockstar receptions every time. And his feud against CM Punk over the summer was the best feud of the year. He left at a huge high. He literally walked away from WWE when he was at the popularity height and push height of his career. If TNA would have made a bigger deal about his signing and not have watered his jump down by bringing in 20 other guys, then Hardy would have made a huge Impact for TNA. And if they would have hyped him up on every show thereafter and on their website like they have struck gold, then TNA's ratings would have rose. No, I don't think it would have had the same impact of Hogan turning heel and starting the n.W.o. angle, but lets be honest and say that such success is an extreme rarity. Ric Flair is the only name I'm really on the fence about. If TNA has brought him back in as a manager, then I'm liking it. Actually, I think I'd like it best if he initially signed with AJ, but then turns on him by helping someone else win and keep the World Title. I wouldn't even mind one Flair/AJ match from such a storyline. But if this is just Flair returning to wrestling, then I'm not really liking that. Flair shouldn't be an active wrestler. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General Wrestling · Next Topic » |







6:55 PM Jul 11