|
Division 1 Draft - Picks and Draft Discussion; Discuss picks here!
|
|
Topic Started: Oct 23 2008, 08:48 PM (2,509 Views)
|
|
Perth Swans
|
Oct 27 2008, 02:51 PM
Post #101
|
- Posts:
- 287
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #15
- Joined:
- October 23, 2008
|
I chose McPharlin because he gets decent scores at CHB. Sewell I find is a very consistent performer.
|
|
|
| |
|
dtm 06
|
Oct 27 2008, 03:04 PM
Post #102
|
David Schwartz is an admin! This game is therefore awesome&#
- Posts:
- 548
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #3
- Joined:
- October 21, 2008
|
I thought sewell was a bit of a suprise but mcpharlin is a good soring key back.
I went burgoyne because port and therefore he should be better next year and he scored 105 anyway.
|
|
|
| |
|
Perth Swans
|
Oct 27 2008, 03:13 PM
Post #103
|
- Posts:
- 287
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #15
- Joined:
- October 23, 2008
|
pouks 31 is up next, I believe he is quite active.
|
|
|
| |
|
Perth Swans
|
Oct 27 2008, 03:15 PM
Post #104
|
- Posts:
- 287
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #15
- Joined:
- October 23, 2008
|
I would have thought Steve Johnson should've been picked up by now.
|
|
|
| |
|
dtm 06
|
Oct 27 2008, 03:19 PM
Post #105
|
David Schwartz is an admin! This game is therefore awesome&#
- Posts:
- 548
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #3
- Joined:
- October 21, 2008
|
I couldn't believe burgoyne slipped this low. There is another midfielder that I would've taken with my last pick if you had taken burgoyne PS that i can't believe hasn't gone either.
|
|
|
| |
|
Perth Swans
|
Oct 27 2008, 03:53 PM
Post #106
|
- Posts:
- 287
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #15
- Joined:
- October 23, 2008
|
Not really suprised with Gibbs. He is a star of the future and 2009 will be a career-best year for him. Expect a lot of points.
|
|
|
| |
|
Perth Swans
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:02 PM
Post #107
|
- Posts:
- 287
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #15
- Joined:
- October 23, 2008
|
It says Ziggy has been looking at the Index for 12 minutes. Hope he wakes up!
|
|
|
| |
|
Deledio2Tambling
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:03 PM
Post #108
|
- Posts:
- 895
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #2
- Joined:
- October 21, 2008
|
I have his preferences, but i sent him a msg on MSN as he is online, I'll give him until 10 past.
|
|
|
| |
|
Perth Swans
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:08 PM
Post #109
|
- Posts:
- 287
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #15
- Joined:
- October 23, 2008
|
He finally decided to pick!
McVeigh is a gun. Great selection.
|
|
|
| |
|
Ziggy
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:08 PM
Post #110
|
- Posts:
- 574
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #7
- Joined:
- October 21, 2008
|
For the last few picks the exact player i had on my list went just before.
Maybe i should time them a bit better.
|
|
|
| |
|
Ziggy
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:21 PM
Post #111
|
- Posts:
- 574
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #7
- Joined:
- October 21, 2008
|
wow? Matty Scarlett...
Very very surpising.
|
|
|
| |
|
Mr.Bulldog
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:24 PM
Post #112
|
- Posts:
- 88
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #11
- Joined:
- October 23, 2008
|
He dosent score highly but besides from Lake, he probably scores the best in that position so not a bad pick at all considering we all need a FB at some point.
|
|
|
| |
|
Ziggy
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:26 PM
Post #113
|
- Posts:
- 574
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #7
- Joined:
- October 21, 2008
|
Mate their are 3/4 key defenders in Geelong's team alone that score higher than Scarlett.
|
|
|
| |
|
Deledio2Tambling
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:28 PM
Post #114
|
- Posts:
- 895
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #2
- Joined:
- October 21, 2008
|
- Ziggy
- Oct 27 2008, 05:26 PM
Mate their are 3/4 key defenders in Geelong's team alone that score higher than Scarlett.
I can only see 1 that scores higher than Scarlett.
|
|
|
| |
|
Ziggy
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:31 PM
Post #115
|
- Posts:
- 574
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #7
- Joined:
- October 21, 2008
|
One is ranked 8th for all defenders. The other is 25. and the last is ranked 40. And there is even another one at 57 averaging higher as a defender.
It's debatable if 2 of them are Key Defenders but they have/can play there.
|
|
|
| |
|
Deledio2Tambling
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:37 PM
Post #116
|
- Posts:
- 895
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #2
- Joined:
- October 21, 2008
|
The ones at 8 and 25 are not Key Position Defenders, the one at 57 I don't even think is a defender anymore.
|
|
|
| |
|
Mr.Bulldog
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:43 PM
Post #117
|
- Posts:
- 88
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #11
- Joined:
- October 23, 2008
|
Come on Pie.
I wanna get my pick done
|
|
|
| |
|
Ziggy
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:46 PM
Post #118
|
- Posts:
- 574
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #7
- Joined:
- October 21, 2008
|
- Deledio2Tambling
- Oct 27 2008, 04:37 PM
The ones at 8 and 25 are not Key Position Defenders, the one at 57 I don't even think is a defender anymore.
Nah he definitely is. The height and the role = key defender.
And 25 has played a Key Defender more than once (Franklin for example) so he can be a KB>
But the point is there are way more KB's available.
|
|
|
| |
|
Deledio2Tambling
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:50 PM
Post #119
|
- Posts:
- 895
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #2
- Joined:
- October 21, 2008
|
Well some people might want to ask others before they draft or there are going to be some disappointed people when they try and play a player in a position that we dont see fit. We have to be strict or there's no point in positions.
Scarlett, Harley, Taylor, Egan are the key defenders for Geelong, the main ones anyway.
|
|
|
| |
|
dtm 06
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:54 PM
Post #120
|
David Schwartz is an admin! This game is therefore awesome&#
- Posts:
- 548
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #3
- Joined:
- October 21, 2008
|
http://z13.invisionfree.com/AFL_Premier_Le...php?showtopic=7
I asked this kind of thing this morning. have a say in there.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|