Welcome to AFL Premier League. We hope you enjoy your visit.

AFL Premier League is one of a number of hugely successful AFL draft and trade games. Being a competition with 2 divisions and various titles up for grabs ensures excitement for all coaches regardless of ladder position. People's circumstances change regularly so coaching positions may become available at any time. Register your interest and you could be a part of the fun and excitement before you know it.



Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
YHA + GWSM
Topic Started: Jun 15 2010, 10:19 PM (352 Views)
T4P
Simon Prestigiacomo
[ * ]
YHA get: Hooker + Gourdis + Jurrah + White

GWSM get: Dangerfield + Walker + 2nd Round (FBF)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JamesB
Jarrad Oakley Nicholls
[ * ]
i confirm this
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JCK
Member Avatar
Aisake O'hAiplin
[ *  *  * ]
:o
Edited by JCK, Jun 16 2010, 02:39 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rocklovelive
Member Avatar
Gary Ablett
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Which Walker?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Shabby
Aisake O'hAiplin
[ *  *  * ]
I'm guessing Taylor as he was a Fudge Packer
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
T4P
Simon Prestigiacomo
[ * ]
Yes it's Taylor. But both of those seem to be limited SC'ers whilst Hooker and Jurrah are freaks. Gourdis will be elevated this week - a good young KPD and Matty White is a young mid who may improve but will most likely stay average. Plus I wasn't planning on using that 2nd round pick
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stife
Kepler Bradley
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
just questioning you here T4P, you thought matt white and 2nd rd FBF being added was an upgrade in your favour lol
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
T4P
Simon Prestigiacomo
[ * ]
In the grand scheme of things no it was not, but he wouldn't take the deal when I offered it without those two IIRC.
Matt White though at his best is Nathan Foley-esque, have watched him on many occasions. Has potential.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rocklovelive
Member Avatar
Gary Ablett
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
He's a very, very, VERY poor mans Nathan Foley. Average disposal, average awareness, average strength.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
T4P
Simon Prestigiacomo
[ * ]
rocklovelive
Jun 16 2010, 10:10 PM
He's a very, very, VERY poor mans Nathan Foley. Average disposal, average awareness, average strength.
He's improving though. Did some great things against the Eagles.
Although that 2nd rounder is pick 50 something is it not?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stife
Kepler Bradley
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
no, pick 39 or something

only thing on white's side is speed
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Stife
Kepler Bradley
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
and a good shot from outside the arc
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
T4P
Simon Prestigiacomo
[ * ]
He's developing into a pretty good outside mid.
Yes I'm bias.
His disposal has improved heaps though (a bit like Tuck's) and he's smarter when he has the footy.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rocklovelive
Member Avatar
Gary Ablett
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Tucks disposal hasn't improved. His decision making has. He was in the middle of packs and would just bomb long without looking. He now makes smarter decisions.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
T4P
Simon Prestigiacomo
[ * ]
rocklovelive
Jun 16 2010, 10:23 PM
Tucks disposal hasn't improved. His decision making has. He was in the middle of packs and would just bomb long without looking. He now makes smarter decisions.
Ok then they're decision-making have improved.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rocklovelive
Member Avatar
Gary Ablett
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Tucks has, Whites hasn't.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
reignblack
Member Avatar
Paddy Ryder
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Nice win for GWSM here.



Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
T4P
Simon Prestigiacomo
[ * ]
reignblack
Jun 17 2010, 12:28 PM
Nice win for GWSM here.



How so? Both Dangerfield and Walker have bad DT/SC ratios. IRL I got raped but SC-wise its a win to me.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
reignblack
Member Avatar
Paddy Ryder
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
T4P
Jun 18 2010, 10:43 PM
reignblack
Jun 17 2010, 12:28 PM
Nice win for GWSM here.



How so? Both Dangerfield and Walker have bad DT/SC ratios. IRL I got raped but SC-wise its a win to me.
Just based on personal rankings which often are complete bollocks B)

Quality > Quantity imo

Would want the 2 u gave away,not that keen on the 4 u received

Hooker..scores ok but usually gets smashed by his opponent & makes to many dumb mistakes resulting in goals ,reminds me of Mcguane @ Rich,that is not a good thing.
Q his long term viability.

Gourdis = speculative punt worth nothing atm

Jurrah ...excitement machine but will that = consistent points?

White = spud

V

Dangerfield..Riccuito mark II..future points gun imo

Walker = potential +80 KPF
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
T4P
Simon Prestigiacomo
[ * ]
You may be right, you may not.
Just mentioning that White isn't a spud.
83 SC (granted 92 DT)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Official Trades · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1

Innovation created by Lydia of ZetaBoards Theme Zone