|
YHA + GWSM
|
|
Topic Started: Jun 15 2010, 10:19 PM (355 Views)
|
|
T4P
|
Jun 15 2010, 10:19 PM
Post #1
|
- Posts:
- 60
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #47
- Joined:
- May 7, 2010
|
YHA get: Hooker + Gourdis + Jurrah + White
GWSM get: Dangerfield + Walker + 2nd Round (FBF)
|
|
|
| |
|
JamesB
|
Jun 15 2010, 10:23 PM
Post #2
|
- Posts:
- 31
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #50
- Joined:
- June 11, 2010
|
i confirm this
|
|
|
| |
|
JCK
|
Jun 16 2010, 02:38 AM
Post #3
|
- Posts:
- 231
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #22
- Joined:
- November 20, 2008
|
Edited by JCK, Jun 16 2010, 02:39 AM.
|
|
|
| |
|
rocklovelive
|
Jun 16 2010, 10:10 AM
Post #4
|
- Posts:
- 911
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #13
- Joined:
- October 23, 2008
|
Which Walker?
|
|
|
| |
|
Shabby
|
Jun 16 2010, 10:31 AM
Post #5
|
- Posts:
- 240
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #6
- Joined:
- October 21, 2008
|
I'm guessing Taylor as he was a Fudge Packer
|
|
|
| |
|
T4P
|
Jun 16 2010, 06:09 PM
Post #6
|
- Posts:
- 60
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #47
- Joined:
- May 7, 2010
|
Yes it's Taylor. But both of those seem to be limited SC'ers whilst Hooker and Jurrah are freaks. Gourdis will be elevated this week - a good young KPD and Matty White is a young mid who may improve but will most likely stay average. Plus I wasn't planning on using that 2nd round pick
|
|
|
| |
|
Stife
|
Jun 16 2010, 06:36 PM
Post #7
|
- Posts:
- 635
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #32
- Joined:
- June 13, 2009
|
just questioning you here T4P, you thought matt white and 2nd rd FBF being added was an upgrade in your favour lol
|
|
|
| |
|
T4P
|
Jun 16 2010, 10:08 PM
Post #8
|
- Posts:
- 60
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #47
- Joined:
- May 7, 2010
|
In the grand scheme of things no it was not, but he wouldn't take the deal when I offered it without those two IIRC. Matt White though at his best is Nathan Foley-esque, have watched him on many occasions. Has potential.
|
|
|
| |
|
rocklovelive
|
Jun 16 2010, 10:10 PM
Post #9
|
- Posts:
- 911
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #13
- Joined:
- October 23, 2008
|
He's a very, very, VERY poor mans Nathan Foley. Average disposal, average awareness, average strength.
|
|
|
| |
|
T4P
|
Jun 16 2010, 10:14 PM
Post #10
|
- Posts:
- 60
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #47
- Joined:
- May 7, 2010
|
- rocklovelive
- Jun 16 2010, 10:10 PM
He's a very, very, VERY poor mans Nathan Foley. Average disposal, average awareness, average strength. He's improving though. Did some great things against the Eagles. Although that 2nd rounder is pick 50 something is it not?
|
|
|
| |
|
Stife
|
Jun 16 2010, 10:18 PM
Post #11
|
- Posts:
- 635
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #32
- Joined:
- June 13, 2009
|
no, pick 39 or something
only thing on white's side is speed
|
|
|
| |
|
Stife
|
Jun 16 2010, 10:18 PM
Post #12
|
- Posts:
- 635
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #32
- Joined:
- June 13, 2009
|
and a good shot from outside the arc
|
|
|
| |
|
T4P
|
Jun 16 2010, 10:22 PM
Post #13
|
- Posts:
- 60
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #47
- Joined:
- May 7, 2010
|
He's developing into a pretty good outside mid. Yes I'm bias. His disposal has improved heaps though (a bit like Tuck's) and he's smarter when he has the footy.
|
|
|
| |
|
rocklovelive
|
Jun 16 2010, 10:23 PM
Post #14
|
- Posts:
- 911
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #13
- Joined:
- October 23, 2008
|
Tucks disposal hasn't improved. His decision making has. He was in the middle of packs and would just bomb long without looking. He now makes smarter decisions.
|
|
|
| |
|
T4P
|
Jun 17 2010, 10:58 AM
Post #15
|
- Posts:
- 60
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #47
- Joined:
- May 7, 2010
|
- rocklovelive
- Jun 16 2010, 10:23 PM
Tucks disposal hasn't improved. His decision making has. He was in the middle of packs and would just bomb long without looking. He now makes smarter decisions. Ok then they're decision-making have improved.
|
|
|
| |
|
rocklovelive
|
Jun 17 2010, 12:14 PM
Post #16
|
- Posts:
- 911
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #13
- Joined:
- October 23, 2008
|
Tucks has, Whites hasn't.
|
|
|
| |
|
reignblack
|
Jun 17 2010, 12:28 PM
Post #17
|
- Posts:
- 499
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #16
- Joined:
- October 24, 2008
|
Nice win for GWSM here.
|
|
|
| |
|
T4P
|
Jun 18 2010, 10:43 PM
Post #18
|
- Posts:
- 60
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #47
- Joined:
- May 7, 2010
|
- reignblack
- Jun 17 2010, 12:28 PM
Nice win for GWSM here.
How so? Both Dangerfield and Walker have bad DT/SC ratios. IRL I got raped but SC-wise its a win to me.
|
|
|
| |
|
reignblack
|
Jun 19 2010, 11:33 AM
Post #19
|
- Posts:
- 499
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #16
- Joined:
- October 24, 2008
|
- T4P
- Jun 18 2010, 10:43 PM
- reignblack
- Jun 17 2010, 12:28 PM
Nice win for GWSM here.
How so? Both Dangerfield and Walker have bad DT/SC ratios. IRL I got raped but SC-wise its a win to me. Just based on personal rankings which often are complete bollocks
Quality > Quantity imo
Would want the 2 u gave away,not that keen on the 4 u received
Hooker..scores ok but usually gets smashed by his opponent & makes to many dumb mistakes resulting in goals ,reminds me of Mcguane @ Rich,that is not a good thing. Q his long term viability.
Gourdis = speculative punt worth nothing atm
Jurrah ...excitement machine but will that = consistent points?
White = spud
V
Dangerfield..Riccuito mark II..future points gun imo
Walker = potential +80 KPF
|
|
|
| |
|
T4P
|
Jun 19 2010, 10:39 PM
Post #20
|
- Posts:
- 60
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #47
- Joined:
- May 7, 2010
|
You may be right, you may not. Just mentioning that White isn't a spud. 83 SC (granted 92 DT)
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|