Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Bigfoot Discussions. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Pseudo-skeptic Sharon Hill Gets no Respect for Behaving Worse Than Badly
Topic Started: Nov 16 2013, 07:26 AM (295 Views)
Strigoi
Member
[ *  * ]
Editor of the Bigfoot Times, Daniel Perez, comments throughout the following article in red text. In the article itself, an Amazon.com book review by Bigfoot researcher Bill Munns is mentioned and linked to. Please do read that Amazon review after reading Sharon Hill's article with Daniel Perez's added red comments sparsely throughout. But before you do all that. More...

http://undebunkingbigfoot.blogspot.com/2013/11/pseudo-skeptic-sharon-hill-gets-no.html
Edited by Strigoi, Nov 16 2013, 09:18 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
GuyInIndiana
Member Avatar
General Peepmaster
[ *  *  * ]
I've seen her post a lot of crock over at JREF. She's no different than any of the others over there: it's just that she takes the time to write a blog as well and claims to take an honest look at both sides of any equation.

I agree that many in bigfooting are hardly objective at all, but there's no difference in the "skeptics" and their blind dismissal of real evidence when it's presented, because they CAN just broad-brush it all as "non-evidence" since they already *KNOW* that the creatures don't exist.

I have as little patience or respect for them as I do for people involved in BF'ing that turns everything that happens outdoors into "proof of bigfoot". Both extremes do themselves a disservice.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Strigoi
Member
[ *  * ]
Well stated. Thanks for the reply.

Funny pic regarding the JREF Forum.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
keilder
Member Avatar
Dreams of turnips and potatoes
[ *  *  * ]
I havenít read the above as I canít be arsed, but I have to ask why would anybody interested in this subject post or read the JREF?

Itís like making a diabetic eat sugar constantly.

Iíve glanced over the years and the threads run sometimes into many pages which I couldnít be bothered to read entirely, some points I did find valid but 99% of time itís just over-educated or under-educated idiots posting.

But you have EgoÖ.that is what is boils down to.

Do I agree you need to be skeptical? With the entire BS outside of these walls, youíre damn right you do, but that forumÖ.I donít get it why anybody posts there interested in this or even gives a damn about them.

Iím happy I donít even know or care who the hell Sharon Hill is. If she doesnít spend time in the woods with you, covers your costs then f*ck her and all types like that.

And Iím being nice. Iíd make a shit politician wouldnít I?
Edited by keilder, Nov 18 2013, 06:20 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Strigoi
Member
[ *  * ]
I care because I seek to reclaim the word skepticism from those who have hijacked it to mean its opposite and who stifle important truth seeking in this world.

http://undebunkingbigfoot.blogspot.com/2014/02/how-pseudoskeptics-hijack-skepticism-to.html
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Doberman
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Good link, Strigio.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you
« Previous Topic · News and Media · Next Topic »
Add Reply

PRINT theme created by tiptopolive of the Zetaboards Theme Zone