| Welcome to Birdraptor-Center. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Cryptozoology: Valid or Invalid? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 23 2018, 02:51 AM (5 Views) | |
| MichaelMorin | Feb 23 2018, 02:51 AM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Hi, Do you think Cryptozoology is a valid portal of discovery or do you consider it pseudoscience? On one hand, certain creatures thought to have been based on superstition and fantasy turned out to be actual animals, such as the okapi and giant squid, to name a few. However, a lot of cryptid "researchers" seem to be focused more on finding things like Bigfoot, the "Orang-Pendek," and dinosaurs, even given the fact that the geography/climate has changed drastically since the Cenozoic. I think that most "Cryptozoologists" are wasting their precious time. Please help. Thanks! I didn't find the right solution from the Internet. References: http://carnivorahfghforum.com/topic/9377481/1/ Big Data solution Video |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · Criptozoología · Next Topic » |







3:19 PM Jul 11