Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to BW7: The Academy Awards. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
~*~JURY GRILL SESSION~*~; Questioning!
Topic Started: Apr 16 2012, 11:37 PM (5,504 Views)
Annie Wilkes
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Now it's time for me to answer back to your jury answers because you kept on doing that to me a while ago. :lol:

Quote:
 
and I find it quite amusing that Miss Wilkes thinks that people will believe her even though she cannot properly formulate her own thoughts on what she wanted throughout the game (not to mention many of these thoughts have no grounding in reality).


You kept on pointing out my ideal Final 3. Just like what I mentioned above, my ideal Final 3 is different from my planned Final 3.

If I have all the control in this game, I would rather be beside you and Cole in the Finals. You are never a threat to anyone except in challenges.

I refused to believe Lisbeth when she said that Howard and Cole would gain a lot of votes from the jury if I go with them. It's true but still, this was my planned F3. There's no point for me to trust you and Lisbeth at F5 because you two would just throw me under the bus if I agree with you. It reflected the F5 votes and I was right in not trusting both of you.

Coincidentally, Howard confirmed that my messages with Lisbeth was forwarded to him. May that be true or not, I'm just happy I didn't trust you both. It's a good decision on my part.

So don't tell me that I have inconsistent answers when you just didn't comprehend what I said.

Quote:
 
They were often failures, but the assertion that I did "nothing" is absolutely ridiculous on Miss Wilkes' behalf. Mrs. Priestly and I took a swipe very early on (read: the first round) at Mr. Salander, whom we perceived to be playing very hard very early.


And both of you failed in eliminating Lisbeth during the first round. Proving your first sentence in that paragraph.

Quote:
 
When it seemed like I had nobody, I fought to create new ways for me to make it to the end. I laid everything out on the table to Mrs. Priestly as to why she would take me, I offered a deal to Mr. Hughes that I believe he should have taken. And of course, I still had Mr. Salander as well, my main confidante. I attempted to eliminate Mr. Sear on multiple occasions, and came relatively close to doing so when Mammy departed us. It was a shame that I never succeeded, but I never stopped trying.


More proofs of you failing.

Quote:
 
In fact, I wonder why Miss Wilkes did not prevail in the most strategic challenge of all: the grid challenge? For somebody who thinks so highly of her strategic ability, I find it laughable that she made such a careless mistake in that challenge that allowed me to achieve victory with an unprecedented number of moves on the board. To claim that I hadn't a strategic bone in my body is false.


That grid challenge? Haha I went up to eliminate Lisbeth in the game along with Cole and Howard. As long as she was out of that challenge, we're good. :lol: So don't even bring that challenge when we actually made the best out of it for our advantage. lolpwnt :P

Quote:
 
Of course, you can easily argue that many of my endeavours failed. I will not deny that. But this game is not about how many battles you win; in fact, I would argue that I won just as many as Miss Wilkes and Mr. Hughes because I still managed to make it here. This game is not necessarily about ruling over the entire cast with an iron hand. No, that is the nature of a game invented by social pariahs or psychologically disturbed peasants who get off at the idea of backstabbing anybody they can for fun.


But you would say otherwise had your plans succeeded. But they didn't.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Miranda Priestly
6th Place/9th Juror
[ *  *  * ]
[align=center]Posted Image

Hello Final three, and congratulations to making it to the end. I must admit that I am sad that I am not sitting there, but at least I made sure that those sitting there are people I can tolerate sitting there, because I brought most of them there myself.

Miss Wilkes,
I must admit you hurt me a lot. You were the one person in this game I always made sure that wasn't in hot water in this game, and I was hoping you would do the same for me. Your backstab hurt me, but I am a strong women. I can get over it. I understand why you did it, but the thing that bothers me is the whole scheme that went before it. You came to me that day saying Miss Bennet needed to go and you would do no other vote then that. We had a whole conversation about it and we eventually setlled on voting out Miss Salander that night.
The thing is, you didn't actually needed to anything like that. You knew that 3 votes was enough to get me out of this game. Why were you trying to play me off like some sort of dumb bimbo by trying to get a 3-2-1 vote. You hurt my intelligence and our friendship because it showed to me that our friendship means nothing to you. You were aiming for a blindside and your moment to shine, and that's that. I am not stupid, Miss Wilkes. I saw right through you when you proposed the plan, and after you directly eliminated me from the challenge it sealed the deal for me you had other plans.
It is alright. I wished you good luck when you told me you voted me off because I was the biggest threat, only to read this in the jury house.
Posted Image
I must admit it cracked me up a little because this move you made might have actually been more of a detriment towards you. Tonight will show if you can stand up to the pressure alone. Once again, good luck.

Sir Hughes,
I honestly have no clue what to say to you. Around the time the leads were winning a lot, you became my closest ally in this game, even over Miss Wilkes to some degree. I adored you and wished to see you go to the end with me. You threw that all away during the vote of Sir Detective. I told you I wouldn't have held it against you if you didn't want to vote of Sir Detective, but the fact that you never gave me notice of what you were going to do clearly showed me all the conversations we had up until that point were merely cordial and had no meaning towards you. Let there be no confusion: if it weren't for the fact that I believed that I needed you in endgame to make sure I was in a good position in the end, you would have went after Sir William. I knew everything we told each other after the final 10 was merely for both our interest at the time being, not for both our interest to get to the end. It's a shame, because you threw something nice away. The fact that you are in the end standing there now is merely because no one considered you a threat. You are the epitome of a floater, and the fact that you reached the end has nothing to do with your involvement, but of someone else. Regardless, I wish you good luck and I hope for you that you did make some allies that will vote for you tonight.

Miss Bennet,
I honestly don't know what to say to you either. Your board pressence is so much different then your actual messaging self that it is hard to make a fair judgment out of you. I adore your shtick very much, and it is the reason why I fought for you that first round in the game, but I felt like you stabbed me in the back since the second round of the game after you started licking yourself in the behind of Miss Salander, stayed their until the final 5, then won the final immunity. The only reason I consider you right now is because you are standing next to someone with no awareness, and someone who is the epitome of floater. Honestly, none of you three deserve my vote at this point, but I have been forced to give it to someone anyway. Miss Bennet, if you had continued a formal conversation with me throughout the entire game I would have had no problems with you sitting there. But I think I have had to start conversations with you about 6 times throughout the game, and all fizzled after a few exchanges. You played your game under Miss Salander's wing, and from what I can tell, you made little effort in talking towards the people that weren't in your alliance. I wish you good luck, because I can still see you pull of a win here.

Has my decision been made about who I will vote for tonight?
Posted Image

I will listen carefully what you all have to say and will vote accordingly. I will ask no questions, but feel free to say what you have to say regarding me. Good luck.

Posted Image
[/align]
[align=center]Posted Image[/align]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Annie Wilkes
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
MIRRRRANDA MIRRRRRANDA MIRRRRANDA!

I have always appreciated what you din this game with me. In fact, I won't take credit of the things you orchestrated in this game. If you read my long ass Opening statements, you'd never read anything about me claiming your moves.

Here's what I think about our relationship in this game:

I feel like you were my Paul Sheldon in this game. And I was your Andrea "Andy/Emily" Sachs.

You were my Paul Sheldon because I always followed your commands, made sure that we are on the same page despite having disagreements with you. When you needed this, I'll go to the plaza to bring whatever you need. But there came a time when I had to turn my back on you, to please me, to prove myself that I can stand on my own without you...

The game. Sometimes it gives me the blues. When you (Miranda) first came here, I only loved the ally part of Miranda. Now I know I love the rest of her, too, like I would campaign for your win if we both end up in the Final 3. I know you don't love me, don't say you do. You're beautiful, brilliant, a famous woman of the world and I'm... not a movie star type. You'll never know the fear of losing someone like you if you're someone like me.

(lolwut)

And just like Andy Sachs, I told you my plans and I told you what if I don't like your plan. And Miranda said:

Oh, don't be silly - EVERYONE wants this. Everyone wants to be *us*.

I just stared at you. And then I realized what have I become, I was slowly becoming like you that's why I had to plot your demise.

Just like what Andy did when Miranda called her:

THIS!:

Posted Image


I hope you understand. It's a move I had to do.



---

And I'm glad that you acknowledged all those messages I sent to you the round I voted you out which seems very irrelevant and unnecessary. But all of those has a purpose.

I was up almost the whole time during Round 6 because I need all bases covered to blindside you. I am aware that you can turn the target on me if you learned about it. The reason I kept on targeting Elizabeth that round is because I was trying to sway the vote from Cole to either Howard/Elizabeth or Lisbeth. Why is this important? Because you could have won Immunity and by that time, I already planned on going to the Finals with Howard and Cole, so I was protecting them at the same time. If you won Immunity that round, Cole has the highest number of votes and if me, Howard and Cole voted together, we won't be able to vote out Elizabeth/Lisbeth, because you/Lisbeth/Elizabeth will vote Cole out and Cole has more past votes than the Beths. I hope it makes sense for you. Basically, it's just a back up plan in case you win Immunity that round.

I have to admit that I wanted a 3-2-1 vote that round but Howard chose to tell you that he's voting for you. I wanted a 3-2-1 vote because of paranoia, I had doubts if you really have more past votes than Cole and even if I was sure that you have more past votes than him, I just wanted to be EXTREMELY sure in case a miracle happens that Cole actually has more past votes than you so that explains my actions during that round. No more no less.

And regarding the challenge, I also made sure that you/Lisbeth/Elizabeth would lose the challenge because Lisbeth implied that she'd give you Immunity if she wins it.

Which later she explained to me that she only said that because she knew that she can't bad mouth you to me because we were best friends. Oh well..

---

Regarding the jury, like my response to Don Vito's, the Final 3 situation is way different from all the rounds before it. They may be mad at you or irritated because you planned their demise but hatred can easily change to respect once you actually reach the Finals especially if you're with people who did way less than you in it. That happens a lot in games and that's why I had to vote you off. Like seriously, I would probably just give up answering Jury Q&A if you're with me in the Finals because I know in myself, that you played a more dominant game.

You're also correct that what I did was risky and detrimental and it showed when I received a couple of votes from F5 and F5 Ballot ceremonies. But I was willing to risk it rather than play it safe. I'm actually glad that I did it, no offense to you but I have no regrets at all.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Billy Crystal
Administrator
[ *  *  * ]
Commodus is next!
Posted Image
I won a BLUSHIE <3
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Commodus
8th Place/7th Juror
[ *  *  * ]
Jury questions? If I am not too late <3

Congratulations to all of you for coming this far. I will keep this brief so I can get back to subjecting random citizens of my empire to cruel and unfortunate demises.

Annie - Hi there sexy :wub: Would you say you were the driving force behind the decision to take out Miranda at F6?

Miss Bennet - I will try not to be nicer than necessary in my question but it is difficult to do so considering your impressive performance as of late. Why did you happen to put so much trust in Howard?

Howie - I'm so glad you were able to survive the slaughter of the men after the F10 vote, I thought you were toast! What would you say was your biggest move of the game?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Elizabeth Bennet
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Commodus
17th April 2012 - 10:57:22 AM
Miss Bennet - I will try not to be nicer than necessary in my question but it is difficult to do so considering your impressive performance as of late. Why did you happen to put so much trust in Howard?

It is unnecessary to change the way you are but one sign of self-awareness (a trait that Miss Wilkes lacks) is adaptability, so I am glad to see you taking that up at least. Thank you for your question.

I did not trust Mr. Hughes, if I am being honest with you. I cannot trust someone who spends all day ignoring my messages until an hour before the challenge and then throughout the voting period, even though I can clearly see him messaging other players via the online tracking bar. It is abhorrently transparent and I do not appreciate that type of gameplay. I think that if you lie to someone, you should take it all the way. Mr. Hughes would desperately go out of his way to "not lie" by sending vague responses to my messages, saying ridiculous things such as "Oh that's what you want?" or "Do you think that's best?" These are not confirmations of anything other than his true character, which is that of a snake.

I did align myself with him as a back up plan because I needed to ensure that I had options and I did not see him as somebody who would be a terribly large threat in the final three, if I were to get there with him and Mr. Salander. I do not rely on Mr. Hughes at any part of the merge, because he made it painfully clear that I should not waste my time doing so. To be quite honest, all he needed to do was tell me that he had cast his vote for a certain round, that he had already voted against Mrs. Priestly, or where his head was at, but he did nothing of the sort. So while I was forced to entertain ideas of an alliance it was not one that was built on trust. The only person I put my trust in in this game was Mr. Salander.

To Mrs. Priestly:

I honestly thought the same thing about you during our messages after that first round. I felt very much abandoned and it is why I gravitated toward Mr. Salander in the coming days, because I did not feel any bit of the banter that we once had was still happening. I longed to be your assistant again! I felt as though our relationship had morphed from a very close and personal one to one that was very much game-minded, and all of our conversations revolved around who was next. It was just as upsetting for me as it was for you, I assure you. I did not outright distrust you because of this, but it made it very difficult to feel that I could rely on you over other people- it did not help that you had so may deals! I do not feel as though it were my contributions (or lack thereof) that hindered our conversations but the content of them.

I disagree that I played under Mr. Salander's wing. Mr. Salander was a very useful ally to me and I appreciate everything that he has done, but I was actively planning my own fate as well. Any ground that I felt Mr. Salander did not cover during the merge, I made sure to cover myself. I made sure to make alliances where he would make none. I made sure to consider options that he did not. In fact, during the pre-merge I would not say that I felt terribly close to him yet, as I desperately waned to be as far away as possible from the leading ladies at first and then suddenly changed my mind to wanting to be with them; this was not because of Mr. Salander but because of how I felt my own game would be influenced by these decisions.

It is very hurtful to hear accusations that I had no time for those not in my alliance because I do not find that to be true at all. On the contrary, I was very upset throughout the game because I felt as though there was a lack of interest in what I had to say on the part of many people in the game. I am a very emotional person and the lack of interest in what I had to say was a major factor in what you may perceive as a reduction of personality. Take this excerpt from my confessional, which I find to be a very raw and candid look at how I felt in regards to the lack of messages I would receive:

Quote:
 
At first, I did not mind the fact that Mr. James or Mrs. Priestly or Mr. Hughes or whoever else fits this description took so long to answer my messages. I was very guilty of being slow to respond as well, but I made sure that I was making everyone feel welcomed and important with every message I sent; however, it took less than twenty four hours after the start of the game for somebody to inform me that I was "hated" by certain people, that my messages were found to be excruciating on every level. This information was very hurtful to me, as I felt that people enjoyed my conversations very much. To hear about such two faced vitriol was like a knife through the heart. So I changed myself just a bit, because I knew that it was not fair to everybody else that I was making them uncomfortable in some way.

I do not feel as though I am even considered as a legitimate person by the other people in this game. During the voting period, I am often cast aside and sent no messages even though I beg several people to explain to me how they are voting so I can do the same (even if it is not my intention to do so). The last voting period, I received messages from a total of four people: Mr. Salander, Mrs. Priestly, Miss Wilkes, and Mr. Corleone. It is highly apparent that I am the least important person in the eyes of the majority of the players in this game and knowing that I factor into this entire journey with such insignificance, that I am thought of as a joke and as someone who amounts to just a "virginal schtick" is so demoralising and humiliating and downright hurtful!


When I am made to feel this way by such a large majority of the cast, it is difficult to remain upbeat and positive and it is difficult to even want to continue playing, but that is exactly what I did. Clearly my personality was among the most divisive things in the entire game, and the fact that I was able to overcome that obstacle that many other people did not face should speak volumes on its own.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Annie Wilkes
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Commodus
17th April 2012 - 10:57:22 AM
Jury questions? If I am not too late <3

Congratulations to all of you for coming this far. I will keep this brief so I can get back to subjecting random citizens of my empire to cruel and unfortunate demises.

Annie - Hi there sexy :wub: Would you say you were the driving force behind the decision to take out Miranda at F6?

Hello hello Commodus dragon pumpkin! <3

Yes. I already planned it during Final 8. I hinted on Howard about it during that round but didn't completely tell him about it. I felt like it would be too dangerous to plan ahead of time especially Mammy could win Immunity at F7 and Cole would have been voted out if that happened. I trusted Cole more than Mammy so it would probably be a different scenario if Mammy survives F7, but she DIDN't..

So when Final 6 happened, I talked to Howard and Cole, informed them about my plan in voting out Miranda, she's a thret and has to go and all those jazz, and made a F3 deal with them at the same time. So I asked them to talk to each other as well so we can plan the Miranda boot flawlessly and we did. Howard and Cole can attest to this. :)

Thanks for the question!
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Billy Crystal
Administrator
[ *  *  * ]
Lisbeth may go!
Posted Image
I won a BLUSHIE <3
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Lisbeth Salander
5th Place/10th Juror
[ *  *  * ]
[align=center]Hello finalists,


Posted Image [/align]

[align=center] Congratulations on making it to the end. It has been a long, painful game and I am honored to have played with two of you.[/align]

[align=center]Annie Wilkes[/align]

[align=center]I have never in my life seen someone try to take credit for doing so much but in reality doing so little. So much arrogance for playing such a transparent game. The reason you and I no longer trusted each other come the merge is entirely based on your sad pre-merge performance, and Elizabeth and I comparing notes. You found a aggressive ally, and you road her coattails all game along and that’s really the only thing you did up until the final 6. I remember in many instances where you couldn’t make a move without seeking counseling from Miranda first and suddenly you expect people to believe you were the mastermind? [/align]

[align=center]Posted Image[/align]

[align=center]I knew this would be embarrassing for you. Much like your amateur game, I knew you would storm right in here with the unwarranted arrogance and delusion and take credit for everything just because you made the final 3. It’s sad and pathetic that someone who was handed a spot in the final 3 because no one thought they were a threat, would try so hard to come across as threatening. Your insults and taunting to the jury is noticed and it just shows your mental instability. I’d like to address the jury now with the truth:

If it weren’t for Miranda, Elizabeth and I never would’ve patched things up with the Lead Actresses and therefore, Miranda and Annie never would’ve convinced Mammy to side with them. Your actions with Mrs. Miller cost you my trust completely. It was so sloppy and so like you, and it didn’t surprise me in the slightest. Problem was, I needed Miranda, so by default, I needed you. You did nothing to secure our loyalty. You confronted Elizabeth just a round before and we both compared notes. It was unfortunate that Miranda trusted you so much because both Elizabeth and I wanted nothing to do with you. You just sat on your fat ass and thought your transparent social game was enough. Pathetic.

So, the crucial Mammy vote was me, Miranda secured Elizabeth, Cole and I, what exactly are you taking credit for? Everyone saw through your attempts to split Elizabeth and I up. I mean, they were sooooo fake and bad. I was embarrassed for you. You basically did nothing but wait until you had two goats to take out Miranda, the person who did everything for your game, and take the credit for it. Four out of the six people wanted Miranda gone at that moment, so I’m not impressed. Had it not been for me refusing to vote Miranda with Elizabeth, it would’ve happened without you. Cole and Howard weren’t even goats like you claimed. You were so convinced that everyone was dumb around you that you underestimated their game. Cole had 3 votes locked on the jury and Howard has 3 votes locked on the jury. What do you have besides your warped view of reality?

This game had Miranda and I fighting to stay alive the entire time, making big moves, and burning bridges, while you were sitting back saying “lolpwnt” because you assumed that was the mastermind position, when it wasn’t. The reason you were never in danger is because everyone wanted you in the final 3 so they could win. It’s quite “LOL worthy” that someone who was so much in control couldn’t even see that.

Having to sit through your opening speech was painful. Thank you. You demonstrated that you have no sympathy, just delusions, so I appreciate you making this job easier for me. I do not want a response from you. Like when you were doing things behind people’s backs, I fully expect you to stay with your lackluster strategical game, and ignore everyone who’s vote matters. You did not play to win, you played for third place, and I congratulate you on that. I am done with you.[/align]

[align=center]Howard Hughes[/align]

[align=center]You and I had no relationship all game long. I admire you for your ability to convince Annie to make some very terrible moves throughout this game. Convincing her that I forwarded you her messages when I didn’t? Genius. You knew you had a goat, and you ran with it, and I admire that, especially with the size of the target on your back. I felt like you were a fine UTR player, just incredibly fake. You were the used car salesman of this game, and that’s why you and I never really talked strategy. You barely responded to PMs, and when you did, it was mostly bullshit. You obviously had plans elsewhere, therefore you didn’t need me, so I shouldn’t expect you to include me in anything. Very well played, but since you gave me nothing of value, you have no chance for my vote.[/align]

[align=center]Elizabeth Bennett[/align]

[align=center]You know how much I adored you in this game. While I think you lacked a very necessary social game, I felt like as a team, we made up for each other’s weaknesses. Problem is, not a lot of that was seen by the jury. You and I were consistently targeted throughout this game, yet we always managed to escape this. Our plan to jump to the man’s side, which is likely the reason I was eliminated in the Maximus’ incident, always comparing notes against people like Detective Harris and Annie Wilkes. So many game changing moments for us, overshadowed because some may may have not gotten to know you.

I’m going to ask you to clarify a few incidents in this game for me, to help shed some light on your game for the jury:

Firstly, the Mammy and Commodus incident. Two people that we used and disposed but regretted it shortly afterwards. I don’t think they quite understand due to your lack of relationship with them. If you would, address the situation, why you ultimately chose to go elsewhere. Also, if you would, give us an idea of your emotions at the time. (You already answered this, but shed some light on your emotions or anything you failed to mention)

Lastly, if you could’ve replayed the events at the Final 8, what would you have done differently? Keep in mind that I likely would have not voted Miranda, and we both did not trust Annie at all.

Thank you.[/align]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Annie Wilkes
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Quote:
 
It is unnecessary to change the way you are but one sign of self-awareness (a trait that Miss Wilkes lacks) is adaptability, so I am glad to see you taking that up at least.


She got this from Miranda. :lol:
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Elizabeth Bennet
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Annie Wilkes
17th April 2012 - 07:55:54 AM
Now it's time for me to answer back to your jury answers because you kept on doing that to me a while ago. :lol:

Quote:
 
and I find it quite amusing that Miss Wilkes thinks that people will believe her even though she cannot properly formulate her own thoughts on what she wanted throughout the game (not to mention many of these thoughts have no grounding in reality).


You kept on pointing out my ideal Final 3. Just like what I mentioned above, my ideal Final 3 is different from my planned Final 3.

If I have all the control in this game, I would rather be beside you and Cole in the Finals. You are never a threat to anyone except in challenges.

I refused to believe Lisbeth when she said that Howard and Cole would gain a lot of votes from the jury if I go with them. It's true but still, this was my planned F3. There's no point for me to trust you and Lisbeth at F5 because you two would just throw me under the bus if I agree with you. It reflected the F5 votes and I was right in not trusting both of you.

Coincidentally, Howard confirmed that my messages with Lisbeth was forwarded to him. May that be true or not, I'm just happy I didn't trust you both. It's a good decision on my part.

So don't tell me that I have inconsistent answers when you just didn't comprehend what I said.

Quote:
 
They were often failures, but the assertion that I did "nothing" is absolutely ridiculous on Miss Wilkes' behalf. Mrs. Priestly and I took a swipe very early on (read: the first round) at Mr. Salander, whom we perceived to be playing very hard very early.


And both of you failed in eliminating Lisbeth during the first round. Proving your first sentence in that paragraph.

Quote:
 
When it seemed like I had nobody, I fought to create new ways for me to make it to the end. I laid everything out on the table to Mrs. Priestly as to why she would take me, I offered a deal to Mr. Hughes that I believe he should have taken. And of course, I still had Mr. Salander as well, my main confidante. I attempted to eliminate Mr. Sear on multiple occasions, and came relatively close to doing so when Mammy departed us. It was a shame that I never succeeded, but I never stopped trying.


More proofs of you failing.

Quote:
 
In fact, I wonder why Miss Wilkes did not prevail in the most strategic challenge of all: the grid challenge? For somebody who thinks so highly of her strategic ability, I find it laughable that she made such a careless mistake in that challenge that allowed me to achieve victory with an unprecedented number of moves on the board. To claim that I hadn't a strategic bone in my body is false.


That grid challenge? Haha I went up to eliminate Lisbeth in the game along with Cole and Howard. As long as she was out of that challenge, we're good. :lol: So don't even bring that challenge when we actually made the best out of it for our advantage. lolpwnt :P

Quote:
 
Of course, you can easily argue that many of my endeavours failed. I will not deny that. But this game is not about how many battles you win; in fact, I would argue that I won just as many as Miss Wilkes and Mr. Hughes because I still managed to make it here. This game is not necessarily about ruling over the entire cast with an iron hand. No, that is the nature of a game invented by social pariahs or psychologically disturbed peasants who get off at the idea of backstabbing anybody they can for fun.


But you would say otherwise had your plans succeeded. But they didn't.

I do not understand this distinction... you had the ability to achieve your ideal final three. All I asked during the final four voting period is that you tell me what it is you were aiming for, and you refused to do so. So not only did I allow you to sit here in the first place, but I singlehandedly disrupted your ideal or planned whatever. It is not me who has the comprehension problem, I believe that that stems from your illiteracy and delusions of grandeur.

You are SUCH a clueless harlot if you honestly believe that Mr. Salander and I would have thrown you under the bus at the final five were you to give us any sort of information. You are the most delusional person I have ever met! I cannot believe I am bothering to point any of this out due to how asinine it was, but Mr. Salander and I were very adamant about how we did not want any men in the finals because we felt they could cipher votes.

You "refused" to belief this but you told Mr. Corleone that you "knew" that Mr. Sear and Mr. Hughes would have some locked votes... quite confusing.

I have already said that I have failed in many endeavors so I am not sure of what reiterating the point that I was making is other than your failure to comprehend anything beyond your warped logic, Miss Wilkes.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Elizabeth Bennet
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Annie Wilkes
17th April 2012 - 11:31:48 AM
Quote:
 
It is unnecessary to change the way you are but one sign of self-awareness (a trait that Miss Wilkes lacks) is adaptability, so I am glad to see you taking that up at least.


She got this from Miranda. :lol:

I think that your lack of self-awareness is very much observed by everyone, my dear.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Annie Wilkes
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Lisbeth the problem with you is you only see what you see and you don't consider that others are also capable of what you can do and can even do better than what you do.

Don't you dare accuse me of having a bad pre merge performance when it was actually YOU who was in danger several times and I had to save you from those dangers. Call me arrogant or what, but I only mentioned the stuff I did in this game nothing more nothing less.

You're one of the people in this game that I defined when I said there are people in this game who think highly of themselves. I do too but not as much as you do!

You have a stinky personality seriously. Most paranoid player I've ever known. Even paranoid than me when I am actually a very paranoid player!

I never said I am the mastermind of the whole game. I am not explaining this to you but I am explaining this to everyone.

YOU ARE BLINDED BY WHAT YOU WANT TO SEE. DEAFENED BY WHAT YOU WANT TO HEAR. YOU ONLY WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU KNOW WITHOUT KNOWING THAT YOU'RE NOT RIGHT ALL THE TIME!

That's your problem! To hell with you!

Call my game amateur. I would call yours mediocre!

My action towards Mrs Miller opened your eyes about me when I already knew about your dirty ass butt even without knowing Mrs Miller yet!

You act like you're better than everybody. I'm sure I'm better than you!! You can't go here and bully someone. I'll fight because you have a bad attitude about almost everything in this game. I hope you're aware of that.

I never took credit for the Mammy boot wtf. I even said it's Miranda's plan. I planned on bringing Cole and Mammy to the finals but Miranda disagreed. This is the root why I planned something against her.

Four out of 6 people wanted Miranda gone that round and only 3 had the balls to do it.

I don't have any locked jury votes unlike Cole and Howard but as I've stated repeatedly, I was willing to take the risk because I knew I played better than them. I didn't underestimate them, I am just confident about my game.

And now you're taking credit for the moves that happened in the game when actually, you were always in danger of leaving. I think you're the delusional one, not me so shut your thinass up.

You don't want a response from me. Well, I won't follow your ass and here's my response!

You thought I won't fight you, I would because I know I'm right and I know you're wrong!

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Annie Wilkes
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Elizabeth Bennet
17th April 2012 - 11:34:27 AM
Annie Wilkes
17th April 2012 - 07:55:54 AM
Now it's time for me to answer back to your jury answers because you kept on doing that to me a while ago. :lol:

Quote:
 
and I find it quite amusing that Miss Wilkes thinks that people will believe her even though she cannot properly formulate her own thoughts on what she wanted throughout the game (not to mention many of these thoughts have no grounding in reality).


You kept on pointing out my ideal Final 3. Just like what I mentioned above, my ideal Final 3 is different from my planned Final 3.

If I have all the control in this game, I would rather be beside you and Cole in the Finals. You are never a threat to anyone except in challenges.

I refused to believe Lisbeth when she said that Howard and Cole would gain a lot of votes from the jury if I go with them. It's true but still, this was my planned F3. There's no point for me to trust you and Lisbeth at F5 because you two would just throw me under the bus if I agree with you. It reflected the F5 votes and I was right in not trusting both of you.

Coincidentally, Howard confirmed that my messages with Lisbeth was forwarded to him. May that be true or not, I'm just happy I didn't trust you both. It's a good decision on my part.

So don't tell me that I have inconsistent answers when you just didn't comprehend what I said.

Quote:
 
They were often failures, but the assertion that I did "nothing" is absolutely ridiculous on Miss Wilkes' behalf. Mrs. Priestly and I took a swipe very early on (read: the first round) at Mr. Salander, whom we perceived to be playing very hard very early.


And both of you failed in eliminating Lisbeth during the first round. Proving your first sentence in that paragraph.

Quote:
 
When it seemed like I had nobody, I fought to create new ways for me to make it to the end. I laid everything out on the table to Mrs. Priestly as to why she would take me, I offered a deal to Mr. Hughes that I believe he should have taken. And of course, I still had Mr. Salander as well, my main confidante. I attempted to eliminate Mr. Sear on multiple occasions, and came relatively close to doing so when Mammy departed us. It was a shame that I never succeeded, but I never stopped trying.


More proofs of you failing.

Quote:
 
In fact, I wonder why Miss Wilkes did not prevail in the most strategic challenge of all: the grid challenge? For somebody who thinks so highly of her strategic ability, I find it laughable that she made such a careless mistake in that challenge that allowed me to achieve victory with an unprecedented number of moves on the board. To claim that I hadn't a strategic bone in my body is false.


That grid challenge? Haha I went up to eliminate Lisbeth in the game along with Cole and Howard. As long as she was out of that challenge, we're good. :lol: So don't even bring that challenge when we actually made the best out of it for our advantage. lolpwnt :P

Quote:
 
Of course, you can easily argue that many of my endeavours failed. I will not deny that. But this game is not about how many battles you win; in fact, I would argue that I won just as many as Miss Wilkes and Mr. Hughes because I still managed to make it here. This game is not necessarily about ruling over the entire cast with an iron hand. No, that is the nature of a game invented by social pariahs or psychologically disturbed peasants who get off at the idea of backstabbing anybody they can for fun.


But you would say otherwise had your plans succeeded. But they didn't.

I do not understand this distinction... you had the ability to achieve your ideal final three. All I asked during the final four voting period is that you tell me what it is you were aiming for, and you refused to do so. So not only did I allow you to sit here in the first place, but I singlehandedly disrupted your ideal or planned whatever. It is not me who has the comprehension problem, I believe that that stems from your illiteracy and delusions of grandeur.

You are SUCH a clueless harlot if you honestly believe that Mr. Salander and I would have thrown you under the bus at the final five were you to give us any sort of information. You are the most delusional person I have ever met! I cannot believe I am bothering to point any of this out due to how asinine it was, but Mr. Salander and I were very adamant about how we did not want any men in the finals because we felt they could cipher votes.

You "refused" to belief this but you told Mr. Corleone that you "knew" that Mr. Sear and Mr. Hughes would have some locked votes... quite confusing.

I have already said that I have failed in many endeavors so I am not sure of what reiterating the point that I was making is other than your failure to comprehend anything beyond your warped logic, Miss Wilkes.

What matters is that I am here, you wouldn't be here if you didn't win Immunity! Congrats on winning it.

Duh? It was proven because Howard received a message coming from one of you. I was right not to believe the both of you when you actually voted me out that round and once again... FAILED.

You always left out my explanation when I said, I believe that I can still gather their votes because people would vote for performances, not politics of the game so be confused if you want to but you're leaving info out of my messages.

Also, you're the first one who attacked me so I won't stop attacking you till you bleed motherfucker! Good for you I stayed quiet during the Fallen Comrades ceremony. I had no plans on badmouthing you but you did it first, so I'm here and I'll continue bothering you.


Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Elizabeth Bennet
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Annie Wilkes
17th April 2012 - 12:07:43 PM
What matters is that I am here, you wouldn't be here if you didn't win Immunity! Congrats on winning it.

What? Exhibit A of Miss Wilkes' many lies during this ceremony:

Annie Wilkes
17th April 2012 - 02:50:52 AM
I had a deal with Howard that if ever you win the Final 4 Immunity, we'll vote Cole. sry

Awkward...

Annie Wilkes
17th April 2012 - 12:07:43 PM
Duh? It was proven because Howard received a message coming from one of you. I was right not to believe the both of you when you actually voted me out that round and once again... FAILED.


Our only choice was to vote you off and hope that Mr. Hughes would do the same, because you were not responding to any of our messages. In fact, I had never told Mr. Hughes who to vote for until the very last minute because I was waiting to see if you would come to your senses and take out a man. I honestly have no idea how you can continue to think in this warped manner. We voted for you BECAUSE YOU WERE IGNORING US. You already chose to vote for Mr. Salander long before either of us had any intentions of voting against Mr. Hughes. You are a slovenly, ignorant ogress and your grasp of logic is mind numbingly simple.

Annie Wilkes
17th April 2012 - 12:07:43 PM
You always left out my explanation when I said, I believe that I can still gather their votes because people would vote for performances, not politics of the game so be confused if you want to but you're leaving info out of my messages.

Also, you're the first one who attacked me so I won't stop attacking you till you bleed motherfucker! Good for you I stayed quiet during the Fallen Comrades ceremony. I had no plans on badmouthing you but you did it first, so I'm here and I'll continue bothering you.


You cannot sway "locked" votes, Miss Wilkes. That's not how jury votes work. Reneging on your words looks terrible; you should just admit that you either misspoke or you have been lying about everything you've said to fit what is convenient for the juror in question.

I am not bothered by your attacks and I don't know why you presume that I am. What I am bothered by is the fact that you are unable to defend the actions that I've pointed out as ridiculous and hypocritical. You keep harping on delusions and lies, and I don't understand why since I am at least basing my posts off of reality. Funny that you had "no plans on badmouthing" me but you did just that in your opening statement. Very bizarre!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Elizabeth Bennet
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Miss Wilkes
 
And now you're taking credit for the moves that happened in the game when actually, you were always in danger of leaving. I think you're the delusional one, not me so shut your thinass up.


And yet Mr. Salander managed to make it all the way to the final five because we worked so well together. Being a constant target and surviving is a sign of good gameplay and adaptability, it's not a negative. The only negative I see here is your megalomania.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Elizabeth Bennet
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Onto less trivial matters now...

Lisbeth Salander
17th April 2012 - 11:31:11 AM
[align=center]Elizabeth Bennett[/align]

[align=center]You know how much I adored you in this game. While I think you lacked a very necessary social game, I felt like as a team, we made up for each other’s weaknesses. Problem is, not a lot of that was seen by the jury. You and I were consistently targeted throughout this game, yet we always managed to escape this. Our plan to jump to the man’s side, which is likely the reason I was eliminated in the Maximus’ incident, always comparing notes against people like Detective Harris and Annie Wilkes. So many game changing moments for us, overshadowed because some may may have not gotten to know you.

I’m going to ask you to clarify a few incidents in this game for me, to help shed some light on your game for the jury:

Firstly, the Mammy and Commodus incident. Two people that we used and disposed but regretted it shortly afterwards. I don’t think they quite understand due to your lack of relationship with them. If you would, address the situation, why you ultimately chose to go elsewhere. Also, if you would, give us an idea of your emotions at the time. (You already answered this, but shed some light on your emotions or anything you failed to mention)

Lastly, if you could’ve replayed the events at the Final 8, what would you have done differently? Keep in mind that I likely would have not voted Miranda, and we both did not trust Annie at all.

Thank you.[/align]

Hello Mr. Salander! You haven't the slightest idea how wonderful it is to speak with you again. I am glad you brought up the subject of Mammy and Commodus as it is a matter that I wish to clarify, especially in light of the claims that you did everything yourself. I believe that my answer will prove this to be false.

I actually enjoyed Mammy and Commodus' company very much. I did not speak much with Mammy in particular, but I did not feel the false niceties with her that I felt elsewhere; likewise, Commodus and I always had very pleasant conversations that I wish had led to something sooner, because I do not think I would have wanted to vote him off in that case.

It is very difficult, in my opinion, to side with a minority alliance- especially when they will match you in numbers in choosing to do so. My main concern was that I did not feel as though there was a tight enough bond to ensure that both of them would be trustworthy to me; I had heard conflicting information about Mammy's loyalty, for example. I heard from some that she wanted to stick with Mr. Sear and I heard from others that she was closer to Commodus, and I believe that that was where our potential alliance with them grew from.

I very much regret the decision now to vote off Commodus, because I could not predict that Miss Wilkes would wish to lose in the final three against men with "locked votes" as she so calls it. I was under the assumption that we would whittle ourselves down to just the leading candidates in the final five, and that you and I would have the option of going with any of the other three (preferably Mrs. Priestly or Mr. Hughes, as those were the two that I focused on aligning myself with around the time of the double elimination round). Had I known that things would go south, I would have sided with Mammy and Commodus in a heartbeat.

It was not my intention to vote them both off that night, because I felt that Mammy would be very useful to us and less of a threat than Mr. Sear. It dawned on me that we could potentially have the votes to keep Mammy in if we could just sway one person; Mr. Hughes feigned indecisiveness so I pounded the idea into his head that Mr. Sear was a far bigger threat than Mammy and that we could benefit from eliminating her, especially since it was becoming clear that Mr. Sear was included in the plans of Miss Wilkes.

So while I did wish to vote off Commodus, I wanted to spare Mammy for a round because she was a better backup for us and quite frankly, I trusted her more than I trusted Mr. Sear. Unfortunately, voting off Commodus set us up for failure and I can acknowledge that; I still maintain that it was a smart decision because most reasonable people in Miss Wilkes' position would not have made a suicide run to the end of this game with people like Mr. Sear and Mr. Hughes rather than Mrs. Priestly or one of us.

I felt rather terribly about voting off Commodus as I thought he was very genteel, but what was worse was that later on I realised that the mistake had farrer reaching consequences: I had voted off a person with whom I had maintained contact throughout much of the merge, who at least treated me like I was not completely insignificant, and this caused me to surround myself with more treacherous and disloyal people. It felt very foolish after the fact that I had sacrificed a friend on the assumption that Miss Wilkes would not resemble a dementia patient. Voting off Mammy was perhaps less emotional for me but it was a greater dent on my strategic game, if you will.

Were I given the chance to do things over again, I likely would have pushed for Mr. Sear to go at the final eight rather than Commodus. With four votes, we could have tied it and Mr. Sear would have left, I believe? I am not quite sure what the make up of the past votes were then. I would not have wanted to vote off Mrs. Priestly or even Miss Wilkes because I felt that they were rather invaluable to us as leading women whom we could stand a chance against in a jury vote due to early game connections.

I hope this was sufficient, it is a difficult thing to talk about. Thank you very much for giving me the opportunity to delve further into it.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Annie Wilkes
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Elizabeth Bennet
17th April 2012 - 01:54:14 PM
Annie Wilkes
17th April 2012 - 12:07:43 PM
What matters is that I am here, you wouldn't be here if you didn't win Immunity! Congrats on winning it.

What? Exhibit A of Miss Wilkes' many lies during this ceremony:

Annie Wilkes
17th April 2012 - 02:50:52 AM
I had a deal with Howard that if ever you win the Final 4 Immunity, we'll vote Cole. sry

Awkward...

Annie Wilkes
17th April 2012 - 12:07:43 PM
Duh? It was proven because Howard received a message coming from one of you. I was right not to believe the both of you when you actually voted me out that round and once again... FAILED.


Our only choice was to vote you off and hope that Mr. Hughes would do the same, because you were not responding to any of our messages. In fact, I had never told Mr. Hughes who to vote for until the very last minute because I was waiting to see if you would come to your senses and take out a man. I honestly have no idea how you can continue to think in this warped manner. We voted for you BECAUSE YOU WERE IGNORING US. You already chose to vote for Mr. Salander long before either of us had any intentions of voting against Mr. Hughes. You are a slovenly, ignorant ogress and your grasp of logic is mind numbingly simple.

Annie Wilkes
17th April 2012 - 12:07:43 PM
You always left out my explanation when I said, I believe that I can still gather their votes because people would vote for performances, not politics of the game so be confused if you want to but you're leaving info out of my messages.

Also, you're the first one who attacked me so I won't stop attacking you till you bleed motherfucker! Good for you I stayed quiet during the Fallen Comrades ceremony. I had no plans on badmouthing you but you did it first, so I'm here and I'll continue bothering you.


You cannot sway "locked" votes, Miss Wilkes. That's not how jury votes work. Reneging on your words looks terrible; you should just admit that you either misspoke or you have been lying about everything you've said to fit what is convenient for the juror in question.

I am not bothered by your attacks and I don't know why you presume that I am. What I am bothered by is the fact that you are unable to defend the actions that I've pointed out as ridiculous and hypocritical. You keep harping on delusions and lies, and I don't understand why since I am at least basing my posts off of reality. Funny that you had "no plans on badmouthing" me but you did just that in your opening statement. Very bizarre!

Exhibit A your cockadoowie face, it's true.

I WAS IGNORING BOTH OF YA'LL BECAUSE I had no choice and like you both stated in your messages, you never trusted me so I did the right thing. To ignore you.

Tell me what I've been lying huh, just because I have MOVES to tell to the jury, doesn't mean I'm lying. I still can't recall any of your moves that either a) made an impact in the game, B) succeed. You're a failure in this game whether you tried it or not. If only for your challenge wins, you wouldn't be in the merge in the first place. But as I've stated before, you earned it but other than that, what?

I think it would be a shame if you win this game, seriously, Like all the big moves that happened would be such a waste because you were barely even here.

Well mister woman! I'm happy you're noth bothered because I would keep on hunting your thinass down!

Also, don't attack my way of speaking because it would not make your game any better by doing it.

I had no plans on badmouthing you until your Fallen Comrades. You have a poor attitude about this, you've became defensive and I saw some true colors ever since the past few days. It's not a beautiful sight Eliizabeth. Not at all.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Annie Wilkes
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Elizabeth Bennet
17th April 2012 - 01:56:37 PM
Miss Wilkes
 
And now you're taking credit for the moves that happened in the game when actually, you were always in danger of leaving. I think you're the delusional one, not me so shut your thinass up.


And yet Mr. Salander managed to make it all the way to the final five because we worked so well together. Being a constant target and surviving is a sign of good gameplay and adaptability, it's not a negative. The only negative I see here is your megalomania.

And your licking her thinass once again. Good for you!

She made it to the F5 but didn't reach F3. For her to say that I have an amateur game? I think it reflects her game more than mine. I played with her throughout the game but chose different paths that's why she's blinded of what she believed what happened and completely ignored my version of it.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Elizabeth Bennet
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
I did not attack your speech in that quote nest at all. It is your reading comprehension that is suspect.

I honestly cannot even comment on your assertions anymore because you keep repeating the same things and no matter how many times you say them, logic is never added to them. You "had no choice" but to ignore and vote off Mr. Salander? No, you had the choice to inform us that you wanted to work with us to vote off a man but you refused to do that. We were very willing to work with you and to take you to the finals, but your refusal to even contact us during that voting period spoke volumes. You had a choice in the matter, you just chose not to take it. You chose to take the least sensible approach of all. I also never said I did not trust you so please do not put words in my mouth. You were bizarrely fixated on some idea that it would be a final two instead of a final three. What I told you was this at the final five:

Elizabeth Bennet
 
Ideally, my plan would just be for you and Mr. Salander to be there with me, but I suspect that that does not align with your own plan. I would be curious as to what you believe the best course of action would be, but I am assuming that you do not wish to tell me until after the events are over.


And, in the surprise of the century, you avoided telling me anything and simply assumed that I was lying to you... because...? I'm still not sure why. You "had no choice" I suppose?

You have lied on multiple occasions because your answers to the same questions/debates change every single time they are brought up. In one instance, you planned to bring me to the final three with Mr. Hughes but in another I needed immunity to save myself. You dreamed of going there with Mr. Sear but you planned to vote him off. At one point you even asserted that you would have liked to eliminate Mr. Hughes at the final four! And now you are continuing to lie about things that Mr. Salander and I never did, emotions we never felt and strategies that we never had. We stressed to you approximately four million times that we felt it was for the best that the final three consisted of three women, but you did not give one iota of thought to the idea and we waited patiently for several days for you to do so.

I think it will be a shame if you win the game, since the game will have been won by a person who honestly believes herself to be a mastermind who is telling the truth in every single circumstance when her contradictions and holes have been pointed out again and again. I think it will be a shame that the same boring gamebot will have won a game yet again, as opposed to somebody who had a much richer and more unique journey here. This game is not about orchestrating every single move imaginable, Miss Wilkes. It has far more depth than just that. If I can get here with all of my strategic mishaps I think that I deserve to be commended for my perseverance and versatility, as I proved that you do not need to be perfect to get here.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Billy Crystal
Administrator
[ *  *  * ]
Coming up is Rod!
Posted Image
I won a BLUSHIE <3
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Annie Wilkes
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Elizabeth Bennet
17th April 2012 - 03:43:07 PM
I did not attack your speech in that quote nest at all. It is your reading comprehension that is suspect.

I honestly cannot even comment on your assertions anymore because you keep repeating the same things and no matter how many times you say them, logic is never added to them. You "had no choice" but to ignore and vote off Mr. Salander? No, you had the choice to inform us that you wanted to work with us to vote off a man but you refused to do that. We were very willing to work with you and to take you to the finals, but your refusal to even contact us during that voting period spoke volumes. You had a choice in the matter, you just chose not to take it. You chose to take the least sensible approach of all. I also never said I did not trust you so please do not put words in my mouth. You were bizarrely fixated on some idea that it would be a final two instead of a final three. What I told you was this at the final five:

Elizabeth Bennet
 
Ideally, my plan would just be for you and Mr. Salander to be there with me, but I suspect that that does not align with your own plan. I would be curious as to what you believe the best course of action would be, but I am assuming that you do not wish to tell me until after the events are over.


And, in the surprise of the century, you avoided telling me anything and simply assumed that I was lying to you... because...? I'm still not sure why. You "had no choice" I suppose?

You have lied on multiple occasions because your answers to the same questions/debates change every single time they are brought up. In one instance, you planned to bring me to the final three with Mr. Hughes but in another I needed immunity to save myself. You dreamed of going there with Mr. Sear but you planned to vote him off. At one point you even asserted that you would have liked to eliminate Mr. Hughes at the final four! And now you are continuing to lie about things that Mr. Salander and I never did, emotions we never felt and strategies that we never had. We stressed to you approximately four million times that we felt it was for the best that the final three consisted of three women, but you did not give one iota of thought to the idea and we waited patiently for several days for you to do so.

I think it will be a shame if you win the game, since the game will have been won by a person who honestly believes herself to be a mastermind who is telling the truth in every single circumstance when her contradictions and holes have been pointed out again and again. I think it will be a shame that the same boring gamebot will have won a game yet again, as opposed to somebody who had a much richer and more unique journey here. This game is not about orchestrating every single move imaginable, Miss Wilkes. It has far more depth than just that. If I can get here with all of my strategic mishaps I think that I deserve to be commended for my perseverance and versatility, as I proved that you do not need to be perfect to get here.

Stems from my illiteracy? Really?

Well, that's really my CHOICE. To never trust you. I knew that you two will do anything to save your asses so working with you two would just be detrimental to my game.

Case in point, I did not trust both of you that's why I didn't go to the 2 of you in the Finals.

I could not even contact you because I knew of your tendency of forwarding messages.

Plus, I kept my communications with Lisbeth. You're the only one I ignored because you also ignored me and other players can attest to this on how lazy you are in communicating with people.




I HAVE LIED!!!! So what? You did too! But I am not lying in this Final Jury Grill or whatever you call this.


It's better for this game to be won by someone who's confident by her moves may the jury or may whoever sees it or not than with someone like you, who did not do anything worth remembering once this game is over. Even now, you can't defend yourself when I say you didn't do anything. Oh wait, yeah, you admitted that your plans have been failures most of the time. I don't know how people should reward that.

No words can defend how you did nothing to this game. Not even the word "depth" or something. It's the truth. You did nothing in this game.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Annie Wilkes
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Show me the money!
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rod Tidwell
14th Place/1st Juror
[ *  *  * ]
Okay hi people. It's been a while, ain't it? I know y'all miss me since I was such an epic force in this game. So much so that I was the first taken out in the merge because of a few assholes who will remain nameless...

Posted Image

But guess what bitches? Rod Tidwell, star receiver of the Arizona Cardinals still has a say in what's gonna go down tonight and my vote is completely up for grabs so you better work for it.

HOWIE
ANNIE
ELIZABETH

Congrats on the final three but honestly I don't really care what you did in this game and all that shit.

I'm not gonna bother reading shit that ain't about me so this question is gonna be all about me. Problem is y'all didn't get to know me that well, so we're gonna play ROD TRIVIA, where you guess my answers to the following questions. The person with the most accurate and pleasing responses to me will get my vote. Feel free to be comedic or whatnot, but accuracy is what counts most. I want to know how well you know what I think. I've asked why with every question but you don't need to elaborate that much. Short and sweet will suffice, assholes.

1. Who was my favorite person in the game? Why?
2. Who was my least favorite person in the game? Why?
3. Which challenge was my favorite? Why?
4. Which challenge was my least favorite? Why?
5. If I had to describe you in a word what would it be. Why?
6. Who do I think was most robbed in this game, besides myself? Why?
7. Which of you am I leaning towards voting for? Why?
8. Who is my favorite remaining Survivor One World castaway? Why?
9. Why did I keep this nine questions instead of ten?


That's it. Feel free to kiss my ass a little bit because flattery goes a long way with me.

Posted Image

Peace out.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Elizabeth Bennet
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Miss Wilkes
 
I could not even contact you because I knew of your tendency of forwarding messages.


...okay, this is all of the proof that I need that you are delusional since I never once did that in this game. In fact, according to you I never sent messages at all to anybody. I will not bother addressing you for the time being but I am sure you will say something equally absurd in just a few minute's time.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · BALLOT CEREMONY · Next Topic »
Add Reply