Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Welcome to Lost Crisis. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently not logged in. If you are a going to register, know that we often times deny gmail accounts because bots mainly use gmail as a registration to flood the site with nasty posts. So if you register with a gmail, make sure to post as soon as possible (Just 1 or 2 posts will do) and you'll be fine. Register or Else!!!! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| [Pre-Dice]Tak's Requests | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 14 2008, 10:19 PM (3,573 Views) | |
| Takeru | Mar 11 2009, 01:42 PM Post #51 |
![]()
The White Mage
|
Custom item with a storyline purpose. Thoughts? |
![]() |
|
| Panda Bard | Mar 11 2009, 02:00 PM Post #52 |
![]()
Shining Finger!!!
|
These seam as equally hax as they are bad for you(especially having to spend 750 gil every 3 threads). You get my however much im worth. |
![]() |
|
| [-Cloud-] | Mar 11 2009, 03:19 PM Post #53 |
![]()
Apocalypse (Lv4)
|
That's... still kind of a hax item so long as you keep yourself from taking more than 1 a post. Also, 750 Gil for 3 is REALLY cheap, especially compared to X-Potion which is 1,000 Gil for one. I'm just not too sure on this one :S |
![]() |
|
| Takeru | Mar 11 2009, 03:23 PM Post #54 |
![]()
The White Mage
|
Taking more than one per thread would have no effect other than to increase the feeling of euphoria. And I could increase the cost I suppose, but 1,000 seems a bit steep. 900, maybe? |
![]() |
|
| Grendel | Mar 12 2009, 06:12 PM Post #55 |
|
Waterkick (Lv2)
|
1. Do the penalties extend across threads (i.e. if you were at -30% in on thread would you be -30% the next?) 2.What if you hit -100% this way? |
![]() |
|
| Takeru | Mar 12 2009, 06:27 PM Post #56 |
![]()
The White Mage
|
1. I had not really considered it, but that sounds reasonable. 2. The user/addict would go into convulsions, have a seizure, and then pass out. If it was during an Epic or Saga by some twist of fate, then death would be a possibility, but would be decided after a discussion between the player and Cloud/the Epic Host. |
![]() |
|
| Takeru | Mar 17 2009, 12:13 PM Post #57 |
![]()
The White Mage
|
The latest version. |
![]() |
|
| Bowwy | Mar 17 2009, 02:39 PM Post #58 |
![]()
MOOGLE AWWWWAAAAYYYY!!!
|
doesn't cost enough |
![]() |
|
| Takeru | Mar 17 2009, 04:03 PM Post #59 |
![]()
The White Mage
|
Shelving that idea for now. |
![]() |
|
| Takeru | Mar 19 2009, 08:50 AM Post #60 |
![]()
The White Mage
|
New technique. Feel free to rip it apart. :P Edited by Takeru, Mar 19 2009, 05:23 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Bowwy | Mar 19 2009, 06:08 PM Post #61 |
![]()
MOOGLE AWWWWAAAAYYYY!!!
|
ability imo |
![]() |
|
| Takeru | Mar 19 2009, 06:28 PM Post #62 |
![]()
The White Mage
|
Edited. It is based off of the basic principle of Lifestream Senses...emitting pulses of magical energy. In this version, he emits the pulse, locates those with magic, then blocks that access. |
![]() |
|
| Bowwy | Mar 19 2009, 06:32 PM Post #63 |
![]()
MOOGLE AWWWWAAAAYYYY!!!
|
needs to have a magic requirement and bigger values imo :D |
![]() |
|
| Takeru | Mar 19 2009, 06:38 PM Post #64 |
![]()
The White Mage
|
Considering how easy it is to shrug off the effects? No thanks. |
![]() |
|
| Bowwy | Mar 19 2009, 06:43 PM Post #65 |
![]()
MOOGLE AWWWWAAAAYYYY!!!
|
don't taze me, bro. I'm just suggesting. Because this is a TOTAL Magic destroyer for EVERYBODY in a thread you are in, pathetic requirements such as that might not fly as easily as you think. BUT, on the other hand I'm probably wrong! D: |
![]() |
|
| Gin | Mar 20 2009, 12:12 PM Post #66 |
|
Ikorose, Shinsou
|
Since the fact that NO ONE can use Magic for the rest of the thread is the effect, unless I read it wrong. This is really harmful to a magic user like Zander. The stat reqs seem good to me too so 1/2 approval here. |
![]() |
|
| Takeru | Mar 21 2009, 07:41 PM Post #67 |
![]()
The White Mage
|
I still need 1/2 more Approval for this Technique:
And now I'm also proposing this Ability:
Let's get to it. Edited by Takeru, Mar 21 2009, 07:41 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Jingasa_Tha_One | Mar 21 2009, 08:05 PM Post #68 |
|
Seal Evil
|
I like both of these customs. The technique makes it so you atcually have to duke it out without magic, and it's harmful to your current build rocky. The ability is a different case tho. While im a fan of jack of all trades, it does give you a boost, and i would think sinc ea SOLDIER is taught to be good at all instead of one, wouldn't the alignm,ent be better suited for 50%. Your good nor evil... you do what is required of you. Ya know? |
![]() |
|
| Takeru | Mar 21 2009, 08:07 PM Post #69 |
![]()
The White Mage
|
99% of SOLDIERs tend to think that what they are doing is right and just though, hence why I put it that high. I could change it to anything higher than 50%, although since Zander is currently at 96%...meh. |
![]() |
|
| Bowwy | Mar 21 2009, 09:24 PM Post #70 |
![]()
MOOGLE AWWWWAAAAYYYY!!!
|
so, basically, when ALL six of your stats are the same, you get a 25% boost to all of them? <__< |
![]() |
|
| Takeru | Mar 21 2009, 09:32 PM Post #71 |
![]()
The White Mage
|
25% to all 6 would be ideal, but I'd also accept 25% to Strength, Magic, Speed and Agility. Or just Strength, Magic and Agility. Meh. |
![]() |
|
| Bowwy | Mar 21 2009, 09:48 PM Post #72 |
![]()
MOOGLE AWWWWAAAAYYYY!!!
|
25% to all stats is a pretty hefty boost. <__< Even with the odd requirements... |
![]() |
|
| Takeru | Mar 21 2009, 09:54 PM Post #73 |
![]()
The White Mage
|
Need 1/2 Approval still:
And updated version that needs full approval still:
|
![]() |
|
| Jingasa_Tha_One | Mar 22 2009, 08:29 AM Post #74 |
|
Seal Evil
|
I'm sorry Takeru, I thought I mad eit clear that magical nullification was approved. Sorry cause it seems I didn't *Approval from tony.* |
![]() |
|
| Takeru | Mar 22 2009, 08:49 AM Post #75 |
![]()
The White Mage
|
Cool. So now I'm just waiting on JoAT. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Graveyard · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
1:15 PM Jul 11
|
[ Copy this | Start New | Full Size ]









1:15 PM Jul 11