| Viewing Single Post From: Double cipher challenge | |
|---|---|
| jdege | Aug 13 2007, 04:29 PM |
|
Elite member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If it's Vig with mixed alphabets, are they all the same mixed alphabet? That is, do the multiple alphabets differ from each other by only a shift? Then one effective technique is to simply line them up. Generate frequency distributions for each of your alphabets. Then taking two alphabets at a time, shift one against the other, one character at a time, using the chi test to determine how strongly they correlate. If there's one value that shows a strong correlation, odds are the two alphabets are the same alphabet with that relative shift between them. Not all alphabet pairs will show a strong correlation, if your ciphertext is short. But some will. For the ones that do, combine them by shifting one against the other, and sum their frequency counts. The summed frequency distributions will be based on longer plaintexts, and will thus show stronger correlations. Continue doing this until you've collapsed all of the alphabets into a single alphabet. It's IC should indicate that it's a simple substitution. Apply the shifts you've discovered to the ciphertext, and you're left with a simple substitution. (This technique is, IIRC, discussed in Sinkov). |
| When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. | |
![]() |
|
| Double cipher challenge · Challenges | |




![]](http://209.85.122.85/static/1/pip_r.png)


9:28 PM Nov 26