| Viewing Single Post From: Clarification | |
|---|---|
| Gerry StPierre | Jul 9 2009, 03:29 AM |
|
Just registered
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have read through all the info that mosher has gathered. Several times now. And for the most part it is understandable. At least when I read it, which is why I keep reading it! Hmmm, I guess what I am trying to get at - if there are only two rings of text then there are 26 alphabets. However, since no one can be sure that the device has been described correctly there could in fact be a third ring. If there was a third ring then there could be 676 alphabets. So what I was looking to clarify - at this point there is no certainty as to whether there are 26 or 676 alphabets. While the analysis that has been done on the available texts indicates certain attributes, it does not indicate whether in fact there are two or three rings. Correct? Finally, is the challenge that seems more solvable (since it came from Crpytologia editors) is deciphering exhibit 5? |
![]() |
|
| Clarification · Chaocipher | |




![]](http://209.85.122.85/static/1/pip_r.png)


3:23 AM Nov 28