Archive Function

Welcome to Crypto. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Archive Function; does it work
Topic Started: Dec 1 2005, 07:42 PM (450 Views)
Donald	Dec 1 2005, 07:42 PM Post #1
Elite member Posts: 454 Group: Trusted Member Member #8 Joined: September 2, 2005	I was looking at how full my PM box is here, and I noticed the archive function. Looks very cool, packages up all your messages and sends them to your regular email address so you can clear out your box on this forum. However, when I try to get it to work, I get an error. Am I doing something wrong or is the function not.. uhm... functioning. Donald



insecure	Dec 1 2005, 09:16 PM Post #2
Elite member Posts: 381 Group: Trusted Member Member #10 Joined: September 9, 2005	You just leaked information about the amount of cryptographic discussion you are holding in private. NSA - take note!



Donald	Dec 1 2005, 09:49 PM Post #3
Elite member Posts: 454 Group: Trusted Member Member #8 Joined: September 2, 2005	"Insecure" You just leaked information about the amount of cryptographic discussion you are holding in private. Hah! yeah, but the biggest hunk of it was Rot13 helping me get my "Journal" challenged fixed, and I somehow doubt if they are very interested in that. But you never know with the NSA... Donald



cows	Dec 2 2005, 05:38 PM Post #4
Advanced Member Posts: 91 Group: New Members Member #20 Joined: October 10, 2005	Why don't you just ask Revelation to put the amount of space in your inbox up?
	Everything is possible, The impossible just takes longer If we do not know what a particle is doing then it is allowed t do everything possible simultaneously. "Anyone who can contemplate Quantum Mechanics without getting dizzy, didn't understand it."


Donald	Dec 2 2005, 05:50 PM Post #5
Elite member Posts: 454 Group: Trusted Member Member #8 Joined: September 2, 2005	"cows" Why don't you just ask Revelation to put the amount of space in your inbox up No reason to add any burden to the system for something as unimportant as my old pm's. If I want them, I'll just cut and paste em if I can't get the archive fuction to work. I was mainly just playing with it because it sounded like a cool idea. Donald



Revelation	Dec 2 2005, 09:26 PM Post #6
Administrator Posts: 386 Group: Admin Member #1 Joined: August 23, 2005	I don't get why this function isn't working. Bad programming probably
	RRRREJMEEEEEPVKLWENFNVJKEEEEEAOLKAFKLXCFZAASDJXZTTTTTTTLSIOWJXMOKLAFJNNKFNXN RAGRBAQEMHIGDJVDSEOXVIYCELFHWLELJFIENXLRATALSJFSLCYTKLASJDKMHGOVOKAJDNMNUITN RRRRLJVEEEEECLYVYHNVPFTAEEEEEMWLMEIRNGLARWJAKJDFLWNTIERJMIPQWOTZEOCXKNUBNXCN RJIRPOWEANFUSNCZVDVZNMSFEKLOEPZLDKDJWSAAAAAAAOERHJCTNCKFRIMVKSOFOMKMANREWNBN RZUDRGXEEEEENFQIDVLQNCKNEEEEEDGLLLLLLAWIOSNCDARLODMTOEJXMILDFJROTKJSDNLVCZNN


cows	Dec 3 2005, 08:32 PM Post #7
Advanced Member Posts: 91 Group: New Members Member #20 Joined: October 10, 2005	If you all came together - i bet you could design a much better forum
	Everything is possible, The impossible just takes longer If we do not know what a particle is doing then it is allowed t do everything possible simultaneously. "Anyone who can contemplate Quantum Mechanics without getting dizzy, didn't understand it."


Revelation	Dec 3 2005, 08:42 PM Post #8
Administrator Posts: 386 Group: Admin Member #1 Joined: August 23, 2005	We probably could, but it would result in a fight! Pascal + C++ = highly explosive
	RRRREJMEEEEEPVKLWENFNVJKEEEEEAOLKAFKLXCFZAASDJXZTTTTTTTLSIOWJXMOKLAFJNNKFNXN RAGRBAQEMHIGDJVDSEOXVIYCELFHWLELJFIENXLRATALSJFSLCYTKLASJDKMHGOVOKAJDNMNUITN RRRRLJVEEEEECLYVYHNVPFTAEEEEEMWLMEIRNGLARWJAKJDFLWNTIERJMIPQWOTZEOCXKNUBNXCN RJIRPOWEANFUSNCZVDVZNMSFEKLOEPZLDKDJWSAAAAAAAOERHJCTNCKFRIMVKSOFOMKMANREWNBN RZUDRGXEEEEENFQIDVLQNCKNEEEEEDGLLLLLLAWIOSNCDARLODMTOEJXMILDFJROTKJSDNLVCZNN


insecure	Dec 3 2005, 10:40 PM Post #9
Elite member Posts: 381 Group: Trusted Member Member #10 Joined: September 9, 2005	When you Pascal and C++ guys have finished exploding all over the place, we can get on with some C.



PulsarSL	Dec 14 2005, 08:20 PM Post #10
Super member Posts: 157 Group: Members Member #7 Joined: September 1, 2005	insecure Dec 3 2005, 10:40 PM When you Pascal and C++ guys have finished exploding all over the place, we can get on with some C. Or PHP



insecure	Dec 15 2005, 07:20 AM Post #11
Elite member Posts: 381 Group: Trusted Member Member #10 Joined: September 9, 2005	Or C.



rot13	Dec 15 2005, 01:22 PM Post #12
Elite member Posts: 306 Group: Trusted Member Member #14 Joined: September 29, 2005	insecure Dec 15 2005, 07:20 AM Or C. I am with insecure on this one. I use a variety of languages, but when it comes to doing heavy-duty crypto, C has been the best. I do use Python for crypto tasks that don't require heavy computation.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Community · Next Topic »