| Welcome to Crypto. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| 16x16 Sbox | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Sep 23 2007, 09:49 PM (241 Views) | |
| loki | Sep 23 2007, 09:49 PM Post #1 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I was intriged by Terry Ritters Idea of dynamic substitution, after failing at my attempts to make it work. I began to start write a toy cipher which uses 16 8x8 keyed sbox's, feeling very proud of myself I walked away from the project. After some time it dawned on me, a keyed 16x16 sbox. I have never seen one in code nor ever read about one in a paper. here is the code I have used to generate the sbox.
Your going to have modify this code to suit yourself. The rnd() function I call here is my own written macro that calls a crappy LCG. all things aside, what are the disadvantages by using this, have you come across this before??? |
| c(x) = 3x3 + x2 + x + 2; Find the inverse | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General · Next Topic » |





![]](http://209.85.122.85/static/1/pip_r.png)



9:54 AM Nov 8