| Welcome to Exit Mundi Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Social Engineering and Phreaking | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 14 2007, 02:48 AM (805 Views) | |
| Colonel | Feb 14 2007, 02:48 AM Post #1 |
|
Crazy Doctor's Apprentice
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Care to talk about the history of both? Fun examples of either? If I was alive in the 60's-80's I probably would have been a phreaker. |
![]() |
|
| Apocalypse Next Thursday | Feb 14 2007, 02:57 PM Post #2 |
|
Disgraced Dictator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm terribly afraid I know nothing of it. I shall do some research on the subject. Consequently, is there any information you can share about "phreaking" and exactly what social engineering entails? I am curious, and wish to learn more. |
![]() LC's Custom Designs: Get One Or Suffer The Wrath Of The Impenetrable Quickening! "I contend that we are both atheists. I simply believe in one less god than you. When you realize why you reject all other gods, then you will understand why I reject yours." - Unknown | |
![]() |
|
| Killer Bee | Feb 14 2007, 11:38 PM Post #3 |
![]()
|
I was raised through the 80's and I have never heard of "phreaked" or "phreakers". I am also curious of what this means, and in the contex you are using it in. |
![]() |
|
| Flamingo | Feb 15 2007, 12:09 AM Post #4 |
|
Penis goes in here
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I would also like to know what a phreaker is. Do you have a link? |
| |
![]() |
|
| NeoAegis | Feb 15 2007, 12:14 AM Post #5 |
![]()
Israel thug life
![]()
|
A phreaker is a 1337 ph0n3 h4x0r. |
![]() ![]() Exit Mundi Post of the Year | |
![]() |
|
| Colonel | Feb 15 2007, 02:05 AM Post #6 |
|
Crazy Doctor's Apprentice
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phreaking Wiki is a good friend. Phreaking is phone hacking, as NeoAegis said. It involves using the phone itself, and using the mechanics of how they work to get free phone calls. It involved dialing certain codes on the pad, tricking the phones using frequencies of sound, and social engineering. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretexting "Social engineering is a collection of techniques used to manipulate people into performing actions or divulging confidential information." Wiki says it best. It uses lying, tricking, and deceit to gain access to important information. It plays on the psychology and stupidity of people, who will believe anything if they're afraid enough. You can use it just for about anything. And in all technicality, it's not exactly illegal if done right. It's just deceitful. |
![]() |
|
| Killer Bee | Feb 15 2007, 02:36 PM Post #7 |
![]()
|
Fraud?
I wouldn't want to base my defense in court on this notion alone. If you use the phone to deceit someone into giving money or confidential information, it could be considered fraud and that is against the law. |
![]() |
|
| Colonel | Feb 16 2007, 03:01 AM Post #8 |
|
Crazy Doctor's Apprentice
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well, it doesn't technically use lying ever. It's weird. It just plays on peoples gullibility. |
![]() |
|
| 严加华 | Feb 16 2007, 08:04 AM Post #9 |
|
Magister Ludicrous
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Best piece of social engineering ever -- it's even phone-related! -- was done in the UK sometime in the late 80s or early 90s. Dude ran an ad in the paper that looked something like this:
Dude made a killing selling slips of paper saying "call your telephone company and ask to have your service disconnected".... This even made it to court and the judge said (paraphrased), "While I think it morally reprehensible, legally this does not entail fraud. Case dismissed." |
LC Sez:
| |
![]() |
|
| Killer Bee | Feb 16 2007, 01:39 PM Post #10 |
![]()
|
This has to be a sign that humanity is in serious trouble. Maybe a new apocalyptic scenario should be titled "Death of Humanity by Stupidity". I believe in the old saying "if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is". I guess the another saying, "a sucker is born every minute" fits better. |
![]() |
|
| Apocalypse Next Thursday | Feb 16 2007, 05:15 PM Post #11 |
|
Disgraced Dictator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Two words: Pet. Rock. I rest my case. The phreaking scenario interests me greatly, as it ties in with the legacy, of all people, Steve Jobs. His younger days inside of his California university allowed him to make a small blue box that would use the dial tone from a cereal box toy to make free phone calls. While not the start of "phreaking", it is definitely one of the better-known examples. On a side note, Pirates of Silicon Valley is an excellent, gripping movie. As far as stupidity goes, we are technically getting smarter. The problem lies not in how much we don't know, but how much we choose to ignore. People more and more are subject to "selective memory", meaning they choose to learn only what they decide, ignoring the rest. We are smarter, and getting even more intelligent. But there is a point where we have to filter information one way or the other, lest we begin to lose what we had, or drive ourselves mad. Personally, i've abandoned any social skills and stigma for the sake and pursuit of knowledge and science. This is my selective memory. Make of it, what you will. |
![]() LC's Custom Designs: Get One Or Suffer The Wrath Of The Impenetrable Quickening! "I contend that we are both atheists. I simply believe in one less god than you. When you realize why you reject all other gods, then you will understand why I reject yours." - Unknown | |
![]() |
|
| piercehawkeye45 | Feb 16 2007, 05:37 PM Post #12 |
|
Franklin Pierce
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I read in a paper a few days ago about a fraud that involved someone calling a person telling them that they missed jury duty and they are going to be arrested. The person then says they never got a notice and the caller then asks for their name, address, and social security number to verify the mistake. The say it was a mess up, hangs up, and has stolen their identity. |
|
Dropped the atomic bomb let them know that it's real Speak soft with a big stick do what I say or be killed I'm America! I have found the enemy and he is us. | |
![]() |
|
| Killer Bee | Feb 16 2007, 10:33 PM Post #13 |
![]()
|
We had a local fraud case where someone was calling numbers randomly out of the phone book asking for donations to the "Ohio State Patrol Fund". Needless to say, the people involved were in deep shit when they got caught. |
![]() |
|
| Colonel | Feb 17 2007, 04:56 PM Post #14 |
|
Crazy Doctor's Apprentice
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Social engineering also generally uses public known information to find out more information. It's not fraud, because you shouldn't ever say you're the person. You should just know the information needed. |
![]() |
|
| Killer Bee | Feb 19 2007, 04:03 PM Post #15 |
![]()
|
There is a fine line between social engineering and fraud. To use public info to find more info is fine, but when you try to use public info to gain personal info then it's fraud and illeagle. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Philosophy and Ethics · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2





![]](http://z2.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)









8:13 AM Jul 11