Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Exit Mundi Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Mutual Assured Destruction; and the ethics there-of
Topic Started: Apr 19 2007, 12:30 AM (263 Views)
pie is delicious
Member Avatar
Earth Ending Impacter
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Is it moraly justafiable to launch a nuclear retaliation against an enemy after one has been launched against you? You are going to be destroyed no matter what so is it right to take out another country with you, even though the gross majority of the people in said country had nothing to do with the attack?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ikthul
Crazy Doctor's Apprentice
[ *  * ]
You need to make sure that the survivors in your country will not be invaded and killed/captured etc. by the enemy country, so you blow the sh*t out of it.


Thats the only reason I can think of at the moment.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
agafaba
Member Avatar
douchebagga
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
I say go for the spots that would cripple those responsible.
aka all military bases, and whoever runs the country. Keep the civilian casualties to a minimum, but if they do it once then what will stop them next time?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kip1
Member Avatar
Apocalyptic Usher
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Not much in the way of Ethics-just the very real and risky threat that if you attack first and do NOT take out the enemies ability to retaliate you will be met with equal or greater force possibly resulting in the destruction of your ability to wage war wich pretty much means that any nuclear conflict will be swift and probably ruin both sides ability to fight a war and win it
That is basicly M.A.D. for ya
Posted ImagePosted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Debaser
Member Avatar
Planning World Domination
[ *  *  *  * ]
Basically, if I'm going down, screw 'em. I'm gonna take out as many spectators, innocent bystanders and gawkers as I can, in a burning blaze of glory.
To hell with that.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Philosophy and Ethics · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Theme Made by Sionthede of the IFSZ.