| Welcome to Exit Mundi Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The Future of Science; 50 years from now... | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 29 2007, 06:13 PM (2,275 Views) | |
| Magical Gelatin | Jan 6 2008, 04:29 AM Post #31 |
|
El Presidente
![]()
|
I agree with most of that, except for the bionics, health and longevity treatments, cure for cancer, Australia, and the ban. I do in fact agree with the synthetic liver. |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Prometheus | Jan 7 2008, 11:27 AM Post #32 |
|
Struggling Scientist
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The Australia and WRX disagreement I can understand, I suppose its only discussed by the CSIRO, its all over the aussie news. For bionics, I don’t mean accepted as in the norm, I mean people might look at an interactive limb replacement alternative, and by bionics i don’t mean borg limbs, I mean the kind of this that is already happening, like the artificial leg that regulates the pressure etc placed through the ankle by determining it through a processor, of course a little more complicated by then that. As to the cure for cancer, and at least minor treatments for aging etc, apart from disagreeing with it, what’s your reasoning behind it? Im just interested in your thoughts as to why this may not be possible and in your opinion how long you think till we might get it? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Technology · Next Topic » |










![]](http://z2.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)
12:14 AM Jul 11