| Welcome to Die Hard Baseball. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Playoff Matchup: Who will win?; Tampa Bay-Washington | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 2 2006, 02:58 PM (279 Views) | |
| braveschopbraves | Jan 2 2006, 02:58 PM Post #1 |
![]() ![]()
|
Who will win? Go Bucs! |
[align=center]![]() [/align] | |
![]() |
|
| Carlfan | Jan 2 2006, 03:02 PM Post #2 |
![]()
|
Bucs Go Bucs!! |
![]() |
|
| 2002NLChamps | Jan 2 2006, 04:24 PM Post #3 |
![]() ![]()
|
Bucs, I think Brooks and the rest of their D will shut down Portis and Moss. |
![]() |
|
| JzZt | Jan 4 2006, 12:23 AM Post #4 |
![]()
|
Redskins are made for the playoffs. Tough Run game. Threat to go Deep. Exp. QB. TOUGH TOUGH Defence. Excellent Coach. |
![]() Thanks MoRivera | |
![]() |
|
| goredsox1211 | Jan 4 2006, 12:59 AM Post #5 |
![]()
|
I think the Redskins will win, they are hot right now. |
New bruins forum. Old one crashed.![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Marlinschamps03 | Jan 4 2006, 11:18 PM Post #6 |
|
Gangsta
![]()
|
Tampa Bay wins this matchup.
|
![]() Hanley Ramirez doesn't make errors--the ball is just afraid of him. Shadez was the first man to walk on the moon... with sunglasses on. In rookie ball, he drove a ball to deep centerfield, only to be informed he had been traded on his way to first base. So, he sprinted to the wall and robbed himself of a homerun. He can turn a man to stone just by looking at him without his shades. Was pointed at when Babe Ruth supposedly called his shot. The June 24th game between the Marlins and Yankees was not, in fact, called by rain as was previously reported. Hanley had plans. And by plans we mean a date. With a girl. A babe if you will.
| |
![]() |
|
| Carlfan | Jan 7 2006, 08:02 PM Post #7 |
![]()
|
I am stunned. :mellow: |
![]() |
|
| braveschopbraves | Jan 7 2006, 08:13 PM Post #8 |
![]() ![]()
|
Yeah, I am too I thought they were going to come back.... Shepherd almost caught it in the end zone but it hit the ground
|
[align=center]![]() [/align] | |
![]() |
|
| Carlfan | Jan 7 2006, 08:14 PM Post #9 |
![]()
|
stupid Simms #24
|
![]() |
|
| Element | Jan 7 2006, 09:03 PM Post #10 |
|
The Original
![]()
|
This was a toss up game. I piked Washington with the spread, because they were the underdog. Great matchup for the Hawks next week! They'll kill Washington! |
![]() ![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| braveschopbraves | Jan 7 2006, 09:07 PM Post #11 |
![]() ![]()
|
Yes they will... Seahawks-Colts in superbowl it looks like |
[align=center]![]() [/align] | |
![]() |
|
| JzZt | Jan 7 2006, 09:20 PM Post #12 |
![]()
|
I pick Skins against seattle, seattle wont be able to run on the redskins. Redskins n Bengals are my choices( i like the underdog) |
![]() Thanks MoRivera | |
![]() |
|
| Carlfan | Jan 7 2006, 09:28 PM Post #13 |
![]()
|
What? arew you crazy? Alexander well run all over the Deadskins
|
![]() |
|
| JzZt | Jan 7 2006, 11:34 PM Post #14 |
![]()
|
Sure we will see, the skins are made for the Playoffs buddy did you see what they did tonight? 125 yards total for their offence and WON |
![]() Thanks MoRivera | |
![]() |
|
| KillerB's | Jan 7 2006, 11:48 PM Post #15 |
|
Trin
![]()
|
Hey, winning 1 to 0 in a baseball game doesn't mean your a great team so why would winning with just over 100 yards in a football game mean being great? They got more help from Simms than they did from their own team. The Seahawks won't make the same mistakes the Redskins did so it'll be a win by at least 14 over. |
![]() Killer B's: Biggio Berkman Bagwell Burke | |
![]() |
|
| Element | Jan 7 2006, 11:59 PM Post #16 |
|
The Original
![]()
|
Is that with the spread, or straight picks? If it is stright you are crazy. Seattle has the best O in the NFC. Stop the run, and Hasselbeck will kill you. Also our D isn' t 1/2 bad either. Got 3 TDs vs. the Eagles (Yes, the Eagles suck, but anytime your D gets 3 TDs, thats saying something) Depends how high they set the spread for the Hawks-Skins game, but if it is 8 or under, I'm taking the Hawks w/ spread. |
![]() ![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Element | Jan 8 2006, 12:01 AM Post #17 |
|
The Original
![]()
|
Yeah, seriously. How about Simm's last 2 throws. One 5 yards over a wide open receiver in the end zone, and a horrible INT to end the game. |
![]() ![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| braveschopbraves | Jan 8 2006, 01:42 AM Post #18 |
![]() ![]()
|
Yes, but he wouldn't have had to made those throws if Shepherd had caught the ball the play before that |
[align=center]![]() [/align] | |
![]() |
|
| JzZt | Jan 8 2006, 03:15 AM Post #19 |
![]()
|
First off, this isnt the regular season any more. Redskins are made for the Playoffs. Hard nosed Defence. Deep Threat. Small gain threat. Vetran QB. Amazing Coach. Saun WILL NOT be able to run on the Skins. Iam almost 100% sure they dont let him over 100 yards(only if they have a really bad day). The Skins arent my team. Alanta is. Seahawks dont have a threat through the air. They are ok through the air but have STUNK IT UP in the playoffs. And they will do so again. Brunell plays better, Portis plays better. Skins by 10. |
![]() Thanks MoRivera | |
![]() |
|
| JzZt | Jan 8 2006, 03:16 AM Post #20 |
![]()
|
Also Simms played good check the stats. Skins defence WAS TO GOOD didnt let the big gain, didnt give him time, blocked passes, sacked him, and stopped the run. |
![]() Thanks MoRivera | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · NFL · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
















#24




7:24 PM Jul 10