Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Die Hard Baseball. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
US Slaps Broad New Sanctions on Iran
Topic Started: Oct 25 2007, 03:38 PM (244 Views)
TheHugeUnit
Come on CC
Admin
The Bush administration imposed sweeping new sanctions against Iran Thursday - the harshest in nearly three decades - cutting off key Iranian military and banking institutions from the American financial system for Tehran's alleged support for terrorism and nuclear weapons ambitions.

In the broadest U.S. unilateral penalties on Iran since the takeover of the U.S. Embassy in 1979, the administration slapped sanctions on Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, a main unit of its defense ministry, three of its largest banks and eight people that it said are engaged in missile trade and back extremist groups throughout the Middle East.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said the moves would further isolate the Islamic republic's government by further distancing it from the international economy and discouraging its trading partners from continuing to do business with it.

At the same time, they stressed that offers for negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program remain on the table and that the sacnctions are not a sign of imminent military action. The U.S. officials insist - over Iranian denials - that the nuclear program is a cover for atomic weapons development.

"Unfortunately, the Iranian government continues to spurn our offer of open negotiations, instead threatening peace and security," through its nuclear program, production and export of ballistic missiles and backing for Shia insurgents in Iraq , the Taliban in Afghanistan , Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, Rice said.

The United States has long labeled Iran a state supporter of terrorism and has been working for years to gain support for tougher sanctions from the international community aimed at keeping the country from developing nuclear weapons. It has won two U.N. Security Council sanctions resolutions but a third has been held up by Chinese and Russian opposition.

The State Department said at least two permanent members of the Security Council - Britain and France - had been informed of the sanctions before the announcement, but that Russian officials could not be reached and learned of the measures only afterward when Rice managed to get through to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

Russian President Vladimir Putin criticized the move, saying new international sanctions are not advisable.

"Why worsen the situation by threatening sanctions and bring it to a dead end?" Putin said in a veiled reference to the U.S. push for harsher international sanctions. "It's not the best way to resolve the situation by running around like a madman with a razor blade in his hand."

Rice, who also noted Iran's hardline anti-Israel stance, said the moves were part of "a comprehensive policy to confront the threatening behavior of the Iranians" but that Washington remains committed to "a diplomatic solution."

Other officials echoed that sentiment, maintaining the announcement is not a prelude to armed conflict with Iran despite concerns from some allies that the administration is building a case for war.

"In no way, shape of form does it anticipate the use of force," said Nicholas Burns, the State Department's No. 3 diplomat.

Instead, officials said they hope the measures will increase pressure on Iran to take a deal offered last year that would give the oil-rich country economic and other incentives in exchange for dropping nuclear activities that could produce a bomb.

In Tehran, the Guards' chief, General Mohammad Ali Jafari, shrugged off increased U.S. pressure on the force.

"Today, enemy has concentrated sharp point of its attacks on the Guards," Jafari told a military ceremony in Mashhad, east of Tehran, according to the state news agency IRNA. "They have applied all their efforts to reduce the efficiency of this revolutionary body. Now as always, the corps is ready to defend the ideals of the revolution more than ever before."

Israel, on the other hand, said it was pleased.

"Israel welcomes the U.S. government's decision," Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said in Jerusalem. "We see this as an important contribution to the international effort to intensify pressure on Iran to abandon its nuclear program."

Iran has ignored previous, smaller attempts to apply international and financial sanctions, and says the conditions Washington has set for talks are unacceptable. Iran is continuing work on its nuclear program, which it says is peaceful.

The sanctions target 25 Iranian entities, including individuals and companies owned or controlled by the Revolutionary Guard that play a major role in Iran's domestic economy and international trade. They are the first of their type taken by the United States specifically against the armed forces of another government.

In addition to freezing any assets they may have in U.S. jurisdictions, something officials acknowledged would be of minimal effect, the sanctions also bar Americans from doing business with them.

But of far greater impact, officials said, they will subject foreign firms to U.S. sanctions if they engage with the designated entities.

The Revolutionary Guard Corps and its Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics - also known as IRCG - is the largest component of iran's military. It was designated as a proliferator of ballistic missile technology. The defense ministry entity is the parent organization for Iran's aerospace and ballistic missile operations.

Paulson called on "responsible banks and companies around the world" to end relationships with the three banks and companies and affiliates of the IRGC and noted that because of the IRGC's reach into business and other spheres, "it is increasingly likely that if you are doing business with Iran you are doing business with the IRGC."

State-owned banks Bank Melli, Bank Mellat and Bank Saderat were named supporters of global terrorist groups for their activities in Afghanistan, Iraq and the Middle East. Along with Bank Sepah, which was already under U.S. and U.N. sanctions, the institutions account for more than 50 percent of Iran's banking sector, Treasury officials said.

"As awareness of Iran's deceptive behavior has grown, many banks around the world have decided as a matter of prudence and integrity that Iran's business is simply not worth the risk," Paulson said. "It is plain and simple: Reputable institutions do not want to be the bankers for this dangerous regime."

The Quds Force, a part of the Guard Corps that Washington accuses of providing weapons, including powerful bombs blamed for the deaths of U.S. soldiers in Iraq, was named a supporter of designated terrorist organizations.

The Revolutionary Guards organization, formed to safeguard Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution, has pushed well beyond its military roots, and now owns car factories and construction firms and operates newspaper groups and oil fields.

Current and former members now hold a growing role across the country's government and economy, sometimes openly and other times in shadows.

The guards have gained a particularly big role in the country's oil and gas industry in recent years, as the national oil company has signed several contracts with a guards-operated construction company. Some have been announced publicly, including a $2 billion deal in 2006 to develop part of the important Pars gas field.

Now numbering about 125,000 members, they report directly to the supreme leader - Ali Khamenei - and officially handle internal security. The small Quds Force wing is thought to operate overseas, having helped to create the militant Hezbollah group in 1982 in Lebanon and to arm Bosnian Muslims during the Balkan wars.

AP Diplomatic Correspondent Anne Gearan and Associated Press Writer Jeannine Aversa contributed to this story.

http://news.aol.com/story/_a/us-slaps-broa...025144509990011
Posted Image
Posted Image
Click Here For a Pic of OESH BEAST Montero
oeshbach - on his Italians roots
 
not all italians shit their pants

Rockshu
 
I had a dream where I was playing RF for the Yankees against the Red Sox and Joe Torre was yelling at me in the outfield...Helloooooo erection
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bloss
Member Avatar
WE THE PEOPLE
Members
i have got this thing about making countrys that may have nukes mad... but is just me
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
bostonfanatic87
Member Avatar

Members
See, we don't like crazy people we don't like to have nukes, but crazy friends (Israel) it's ok, they can have nukes.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Caulfield
Member Avatar
Master of the Sardonic Arts
Members
Give it a year or three, we'll be invading Iran in no time.
"To be a man you must have honor; honor and a peeeeeeeeeeeeenis!"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kyyankgrrl
Member Avatar
Feminist & Proud
Members
Six months, top, and we'll be in Iran.

Why does the United States get to decide who can have nuclear weapons and who cannot?
Posted Image
Sig by Detroittigerfan28

In politics, if you want anything said, ask a man; if you want anything done, ask a woman. - Margaret Thatcher

I never married because there was no need. I have three pets at home which answer the same purpose as a husband. I have a dog that growls every morning, a parrot that swears all afternoon, and a cat that comes home late at night - Marie Corelli (19th century author)

Faith is taking the first step even when you don't see the whole staircase. - Martin Luther King, Jr.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TheHugeUnit
Come on CC
Admin
kyyankgrrl,Oct 26 2007
05:42 PM
Why does the United States get to decide who can have nuclear weapons and who cannot?

King of the Hill.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Click Here For a Pic of OESH BEAST Montero
oeshbach - on his Italians roots
 
not all italians shit their pants

Rockshu
 
I had a dream where I was playing RF for the Yankees against the Red Sox and Joe Torre was yelling at me in the outfield...Helloooooo erection
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rockshu
Member Avatar
Professional Indian
Members
kyyankgrrl,Oct 26 2007
06:42 PM
Six months, top, and we'll be in Iran.

Why does the United States get to decide who can have nuclear weapons and who cannot?

Because you guys are the "responsible" ones, even though you're the only country to ever actually use one on another country before...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Element
The Original
Admin
Rockshu,Oct 26 2007
03:54 PM
kyyankgrrl,Oct 26 2007
06:42 PM
Six months, top, and we'll be in Iran.

Why does the United States get to decide who can have nuclear weapons and who cannot?

Because you guys are the "responsible" ones, even though you're the only country to ever actually use one on another country before...

Because the world would be so much better off if world war two continued.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kyyankgrrl
Member Avatar
Feminist & Proud
Members
Element,Oct 26 2007
07:24 PM
Rockshu,Oct 26 2007
03:54 PM
kyyankgrrl,Oct 26 2007
06:42 PM
Six months, top, and we'll be in Iran.

Why does the United States get to decide who can have nuclear weapons and who cannot?

Because you guys are the "responsible" ones, even though you're the only country to ever actually use one on another country before...

Because the world would be so much better off if world war two continued.

So when the United States uses nuclear weapons, it's a good thing....but if another country even HAS nuclear weapons, all hell breaks loose....gotcha.... :rolleyes:
Posted Image
Sig by Detroittigerfan28

In politics, if you want anything said, ask a man; if you want anything done, ask a woman. - Margaret Thatcher

I never married because there was no need. I have three pets at home which answer the same purpose as a husband. I have a dog that growls every morning, a parrot that swears all afternoon, and a cat that comes home late at night - Marie Corelli (19th century author)

Faith is taking the first step even when you don't see the whole staircase. - Martin Luther King, Jr.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TheHugeUnit
Come on CC
Admin
kyyankgrrl,Oct 26 2007
10:24 PM
Element,Oct 26 2007
07:24 PM
Rockshu,Oct 26 2007
03:54 PM
kyyankgrrl,Oct 26 2007
06:42 PM
Six months, top, and we'll be in Iran.

Why does the United States get to decide who can have nuclear weapons and who cannot?

Because you guys are the "responsible" ones, even though you're the only country to ever actually use one on another country before...

Because the world would be so much better off if world war two continued.

So when the United States uses nuclear weapons, it's a good thing....but if another country even HAS nuclear weapons, all hell breaks loose....gotcha.... :rolleyes:

I think we only used it twice and both of those of those times saved a lot of american lives and a long delay to the end of WW2..... I don't have a log on when we used them but meh.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Click Here For a Pic of OESH BEAST Montero
oeshbach - on his Italians roots
 
not all italians shit their pants

Rockshu
 
I had a dream where I was playing RF for the Yankees against the Red Sox and Joe Torre was yelling at me in the outfield...Helloooooo erection
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kyyankgrrl
Member Avatar
Feminist & Proud
Members
Yeah, we used them twice, on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, both in 1945. And yes, it saved American lives and ended WW2.

But again, does that give us the right to decide who can have nuclear weapons and who cannot? No matter how much we call other countries "evil", WE are the only ones to have used nuclear weapons.
Posted Image
Sig by Detroittigerfan28

In politics, if you want anything said, ask a man; if you want anything done, ask a woman. - Margaret Thatcher

I never married because there was no need. I have three pets at home which answer the same purpose as a husband. I have a dog that growls every morning, a parrot that swears all afternoon, and a cat that comes home late at night - Marie Corelli (19th century author)

Faith is taking the first step even when you don't see the whole staircase. - Martin Luther King, Jr.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rockshu
Member Avatar
Professional Indian
Members
kyyankgrrl,Oct 26 2007
11:43 PM
Yeah, we used them twice, on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, both in 1945. And yes, it saved American lives and ended WW2.

But again, does that give us the right to decide who can have nuclear weapons and who cannot? No matter how much we call other countries "evil", WE are the only ones to have used nuclear weapons.

It's very debatable that the nuclear weapons you dropped on Japan even stopped the war. Most historians believe that Japan was on the brink of surrender anyways, and the nuclear attacks basically just forced their hands. The fact that over 98% of the casualties from your nuclear attacks were Japanese citizens should tell you exactly who the monsters are.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Arroyo Vaughn

Members
blame the emperor for messing missing with Pearl Habor and messing with America. If you don't want to get nuked, don't get involved!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.
« Previous Topic · Politics · Next Topic »
Add Reply