Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Posted Image
Welcome to Nexus Trek

We are a message board community filled with members from several different Star Trek
sites. Come talk about Trek, other Sci Fi or whatever interests you!

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board
and cannot join in on the fun. Registering will only take a minute and once approved you can

  • customize your profile
  • Send personal messages
  • Vote in polls
  • Start and post in topics

Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!
If you have any trouble registering please email us @ nexustrek@yahoo.com


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
wigless brits
Topic Started: Jul 17 2007, 01:40 PM (152 Views)
wissaboo
Member Avatar
Admiral
Quote:
 
Wigs off as Britain ends courtroom tradition Fri Jul 13, 11:56 AM ET



LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's lawyers and judges are to break with centuries-old tradition and cease wearing white horse-hair wigs in non-criminal cases, the head of the country's judiciary announced on Thursday.


The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, said new dress rules would mean the wigs, which British legal professionals have worn since the 17th century, would not be needed in civil or family court cases.

Wing collars and bands -- white cotton strips worn round the neck -- can also be dispensed with in such cases according to the reforms, while judges will need just one gown in future instead of a variety of colorful outfits currently required.

The wigs will still be worn in criminal courts.

"At present High Court judges have no less than five different sets of working dress, depending on the jurisdiction in which they are sitting and the season of the year," Phillips said in a statement.

"After widespread consultation it has been decided to simplify this."

A review carried out in 2003 found that more than two thirds of respondents wanted to eliminate the wigs in civil cases, although most said criminal court judges should still wear them.

Opponents of wigs thought they were anachronistic, as well as uncomfortable and expensive.

A shoulder-length ceremonial wig costs more than 1,500 pounds ($3,000) while the shorter ones worn by lawyers cost about 400 pounds each.

However, the idea of abolishing them has met with disapproval from some lawyers who feel the wigs give them an air of authority as well as anonymity.

"While there will never be unanimity of view about court dress, the desirability of these changes has a broad measure of agreement," Phillips said.




http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070713/od_nm/...WGvLucY7IcZ.3QA


personally I think they should either have them or not have them. Doesn't make a lot of sense to have them in some courts but not others.

In canada the lawyers still wear robes during trials but their is only one style.
Posted Image
Offline
 
fleshandblood
Member Avatar
Commodore
Oh good... as a Brit i am glad that is happening, they look rediculus and i have always found them funny... how can you take a judge seriously when they have a lump of white hair just perched on their heads?

Still, it is a very British thing, and its a shame they are loosing them. I'm sure its one of our stereotypes.
Posted Image
Offline
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · News, World Events, History · Next Topic »

Today's New Posts