Sooden military forces invade northern Firmador; Accuses Governmental forces of assaulting Las Closcas - Forums undergoing minor renovation...post all problems in the appropriate administrative folder
| Welcome to Panessos Regional Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit. Panessos is a region within the politics-related, nation simulator, NationStates. A freely available, browser-based game, Panessos is a region of steady growth focussing on quality role-play (RP), literature, imagination and fun. While we are limited in who we invite to join us, we welcome any expressions of interest to the region itself and invite you to join our forums to have some fun, regardless of whether you're in the region or not. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Flag Creation Act - FCA [ABANDONED]; To establish rules for nation's flags | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 1 2013, 11:12 PM (283 Views) | |
| Deleted User | Oct 1 2013, 11:12 PM Post #1 |
|
Deleted User
|
![]() Flag Creation Act i. Determines that all nations within the Region of Panessos must have a personalised flag. ii. Determines that all nations within without proper flags will be embargoed (ICly) by signatories of the FCA. iii. Material for inappropriate flags follows: - Flag of Australian Aborginals (default) -Any other stock flags of well-known real-life nations; variation flags of smaller nations may be used. Strength: Mild Votes Required to Pass: 10 |
|
|
| Gillenor | Oct 1 2013, 11:15 PM Post #2 |
|
Administrator
![]()
|
I actually kinda like the sound of this bill, I think we need to specify on stuff a bit more first. |
![]() |
|
| Naybra | Oct 1 2013, 11:43 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Minister of Internal Affairs
![]()
|
I agree with its intent, but maybe add a part stating it must follow all NS flag policy, which includes the message about the swastica. I think Another idea, instead of restricting a Senate vote, why not put IC sanctions on them? Like trade embargoes... |
![]() |
|
| Gillenor | Oct 1 2013, 11:46 PM Post #4 |
|
Administrator
![]()
|
It's literally NS rules that you can't have Swastikas. |
![]() |
|
| Naybra | Oct 2 2013, 12:59 AM Post #5 |
![]()
Minister of Internal Affairs
![]()
|
You are right on that, my apologizes. Its been a long time since I read the "One Stop Rules Shop." They've changed some things. My opinion on Point 5 still stands. |
![]() |
|
| Urenus | Oct 2 2013, 11:27 AM Post #6 |
|
Senator
![]()
|
i also think that we must define point 5 a little bit further. Just something like "such as..." would be enough in my opinion. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Oct 2 2013, 02:41 PM Post #7 |
|
Deleted User
|
FCA |
|
|
| Nerod | Oct 2 2013, 08:00 PM Post #8 |
|
Emperor of the GNNE.
![]()
|
The GNNE is totally against this motion, as we think that a nation has the right to have the flag it wants. |
![]() |
|
| Imbrisian | Oct 3 2013, 12:39 AM Post #9 |
|
Administrator
![]()
|
@Nerod: Except having the same flag as another nation, despite being something might want, should be disallowed to prevent confusion and possible attacks under a false banner. On my phone and didn't want to hit the quote button, lol. |
![]() |
|
| Naybra | Oct 3 2013, 01:54 AM Post #10 |
![]()
Minister of Internal Affairs
![]()
|
Naybra is AGAINST this draft, as we believe it was not nearely edited enough. Terms need to be ironed out. Therefore, I put a motion to end voting and return the document to the drafting stage. |
![]() |
|
| Urenus | Oct 3 2013, 09:36 AM Post #11 |
|
Senator
![]()
|
I second this |
![]() |
|
| Nerod | Oct 3 2013, 10:33 AM Post #12 |
|
Emperor of the GNNE.
![]()
|
I'm against the FCA, but we second Naybra's motion because we think it will be easier to destroy this motion on the drafting stage. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Oct 3 2013, 02:41 PM Post #13 |
|
Deleted User
|
The FCA has been edited. |
|
|
| Libraria and Ausitoria | Oct 6 2013, 08:44 PM Post #14 |
|
Prime Minister & Speaker of the Senate
![]()
|
I am not convinced that the majority should be able to force the minority to ICly embargo nations. |
![]() |
|
| Nerod | Oct 6 2013, 10:38 PM Post #15 |
|
Emperor of the GNNE.
![]()
|
Yep... and I feel that Trade Embargos are part of the Ministry of Economics and Trade, my ministry. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Legislative Library · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2










2:21 PM Jul 11