| Viewing Single Post From: What would Kessen need to be a breakthrough? | |
|---|---|
| Fayt | Aug 21 2007, 01:21 AM |
|
Sakon, has left the topic.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That I agree with, Kessen II was woeful for historical value; at least Kessen III is very close with of course fictional aspects to add parts to the story. As for Slick, "More fun" - I think the games are fun but certainly not the pick up and play style fun we become used to from the Warriors titles - that I can understand. Kessen takes a while to get into before you can enjoy it, like most strategy games actually - but once you do I find them rather addictive and challenging. I think K3 was good enough to sell well, maybe it was poorly marketed or something; that and the fact the prior Kessens weren't amazing probably didn't help it either... Edit: The 2nd was good as well, but I couldn't agree more on being too short and easy; oh and add the terrible voiceover timing. >.> |
![]() Star Ocean Universe | Forum | |
|
|
| What would Kessen need to be a breakthrough? · Kessen Series | |




![]](http://209.85.122.85/static/1/pip_r.png)


8:50 AM Nov 28