Viewing Single Post From: Historical value

Viewing Single Post From: Historical value
Shogun	Oct 6 2007, 10:40 AM
Generic Title Posts: 2,348 Group: Moderators Member #5,876 Joined: March 2, 2007 Gender Male	Kessen I and III are much more accurate than the SW games. Kessen II has a lot of historical inaccuracy: -Liu Zhang did not ally with Cao Cao and never knew him as a child -Zhang Fei did not kill Xiahou Yuan -Wu obviously did not submit to Wei -Sun Quan's sister wasn't called Sun Li -Cao Cao wasn't Liu Bei's brother -The love triangle and Diao Chan is complete bullcrap -Himiko has absolutely nothing to do with this -Zhuge Liang was not a sorcerer -Liu Bei did not defy the Mandate of Heaven -There was no Mei Sanniang There's a list of other errors, Kessen III: -Yamaguchi Samanosuke died during the unifications of Owari, which was much earlier than his death date in the game -Mitsuhide didn't kill Ishiiki Fujinaga -Otani Yoshitsugu had nothing to do with Nobunaga and wasn't even known in Oda's lifetime -Shimazu Yoshihiro didn't betray or meet Nobunaga for that matter Again, there are still a bunch of things I missed out. But I like how they included foreigners like Amalia van Kyre and that other Portugese mercenary in the game. I'd have to say Kessen II was the least accurate while Kessen I provided us with the best historical accuracy out of the three, I would've liked Kessen III better if it ended at Honnoji with Nobunaga dying.
	The cake is a lie.

Historical value · Kessen Series