
| Hello and welcome to KOEI Warriors (Forum), the official leading Rank 1 forum of ZetaBoards free online service of thousands of message boards aimed at video gaming; specifically the best KOEI TECMO fan site online! With over 35,000 forum members already a part of the community and millions of comments recorded! Thank you for visiting, we hope you enjoy the message board! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. By signing up and experiencing KOEI Warriors message board you will have access to features that are member-only such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, voting in recognized polls, and more importantly discussion and the latest news from KOEI TECMO with fellow fans of their products. Our Members Only section via joining will grant you KOEI Warriors graphics, downloads and more. We also have social network pages on Facebook, Twitter and a videos channel on YouTube, so please find us there. If you need any help please don't hesitate to ask a member of staff/moderator. Thank you. Regards, KOEI Warriors Staff Team Join our community at KOEI Warriors (Forum)! Already a member? Welcome back, please login here and enjoy KOEI Warriors (Forum). |
| Fun Area Discussion Thread; issues, problems, suggestions...etc | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Wed Dec 3, 2008 6:26 am (19,744 Views) | |
| zenkokuku | Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:05 am Post #251 |
|
Troll Lolita
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That means she's Anonymous
|
|
|
| French Overlord | Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:08 am Post #252 |
![]()
Emperor's Retainer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
sneaky ninja *shake fist* |
|
|
| zenkokuku | Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:11 am Post #253 |
|
Troll Lolita
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I asked her, she said she will post here after she thinks of her post, lol |
|
|
| Kuran | Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:31 am Post #254 |
|
빨간건 현아
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My thoughts are like morph's the first some posts. Which means that it doesn't make any sense if im already in defense then why would i need to go in defense again just to defend myself, i mean it kinda contridicts itself if you think about it and sounds like stacking defenses [Defense x2] which quite frankly i don't think its quite make sense because if you defend you defend for that whole entire turn. So theres no need for another defense really.
|
|
|
| French Overlord | Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:45 am Post #255 |
![]()
Emperor's Retainer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
so are we waiting for more opinion? because that^ make perfect sense
Edited by French Overlord, Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:47 am.
|
|
|
| zenkokuku | Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:48 am Post #256 |
|
Troll Lolita
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That makes sense to me as well I think BS went to sleep LOL |
|
|
| French Overlord | Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:50 am Post #257 |
![]()
Emperor's Retainer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
so i guess the most polite thing to do is wait his opinion on that b4 going to conclusion *go start new round*
|
|
|
| Sanada | Sat Aug 22, 2009 2:57 pm Post #258 |
![]()
Resolute Warrior
![]()
|
Its been this way since the beginning of the rules addition... Its not like a defensive stance, they just defend their partner. Think of it as if she has a shield, she blocks for frenchy, does not go infront though, leaving her open instead of frenchy, whereas the attacks at frenchy hit the shield causing her to take damage. This is applicable even without items, as its a shield, not an enery shield, which is the equip ![]() But seriously, its a game, does it need to make sense anyway? I mean, it make sense as far as the game goes that she takes full damage from attacks on herself while defending frenchy, games do not need true logic (even if they have it as mentioned above )
|
|
|
| French Overlord | Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:25 pm Post #259 |
![]()
Emperor's Retainer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
then it should mention in the rule!!! |
|
|
| Sanada | Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:49 pm Post #260 |
![]()
Resolute Warrior
![]()
|
If you go directly by the rules, it doesn't mention that with the defend you take defence damage to begin with, if taking the rules literally, you take full damage for your partner
|
|
|
| French Overlord | Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:51 pm Post #261 |
![]()
Emperor's Retainer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
well the the rule a TFU! you better arrange that for the futur |
|
|
| Sanada | Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:56 pm Post #262 |
![]()
Resolute Warrior
![]()
|
While a bit lengthy, that could be the version for next game, as while the exact same as it has been for games now, it is clearer
|
|
|
| French Overlord | Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:02 pm Post #263 |
![]()
Emperor's Retainer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
just do whatever you want i just dont f-ing care anymore
|
|
|
| Pride | Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:57 pm Post #264 |
![]()
孟德
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well, I never played TOL and never will, but I actually think that it should be named "Sacrificing" not "defending" if she'll still take damage, but meh what do I have to do with it ![]() Have fun you guys, and less arguements xP |
|
|
| French Overlord | Sun Aug 23, 2009 2:09 am Post #265 |
![]()
Emperor's Retainer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
^yeah you beter stay out of this btw if you defend while havin a shield (lets take the first shield x2 def) does your defence goes x3 anf if zeku defend me and she got a shield all the damage directed to her will still be divided? |
|
|
| Sanada | Sun Aug 23, 2009 2:57 am Post #266 |
![]()
Resolute Warrior
![]()
|
Not sure I follow... If she has an Energy Shield, same way as using a defend on herself would /2 (its an auto defend, to the defend while posible would be useless), it will also /2 on you. She will get her /2 while defending you if she had the equip though. so if either you or her were hit, the /2 would take effect. |
|
|
| French Overlord | Sun Aug 23, 2009 3:02 am Post #267 |
![]()
Emperor's Retainer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
ok that's perfect then
|
|
|
| Takenaka Hanbei | Sun Aug 23, 2009 12:16 pm Post #268 |
|
For the Glory of the Flan Empire!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
In short, if someone has both the Energy Shield and Defends the person takes 2.5 damage ![]() It divides from the Shield bonus and divides from the Defence bonus I think I explained that well... |
|
|
| French Overlord | Tue Aug 25, 2009 1:26 am Post #269 |
![]()
Emperor's Retainer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Kow suggested we do 3h round instead of four so who is for the 3h? 3h - TFG 4h - |
|
|
| Kuran | Tue Aug 25, 2009 1:54 am Post #270 |
|
빨간건 현아
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
3h - TFG, Zekusama 4h - |
|
|
| zenkokuku | Tue Aug 25, 2009 2:07 am Post #271 |
|
Troll Lolita
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
@Chuko Liang - Even if that's how it works you'll have to wait till next game cause Defend and Shield doesn't work that way here. So stop wasting your move Chuko~ I agree with the 3 hour thing, mainly because the active ones are active 3h - TFG, Zekusama, zen 4h - |
|
|
| French Overlord | Tue Aug 25, 2009 2:08 am Post #272 |
![]()
Emperor's Retainer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
do we make time limit for the vote like 24 or 48h? |
|
|
| zenkokuku | Tue Aug 25, 2009 2:11 am Post #273 |
|
Troll Lolita
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I dunno |
|
|
| French Overlord | Tue Aug 25, 2009 2:14 am Post #274 |
![]()
Emperor's Retainer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
well i say we give it 48h or until more then half the people agree on something *pick nose* on the next roung(5 min) im gonna advertise the voting here |
|
|
| Sanada | Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:27 am Post #275 |
![]()
Resolute Warrior
![]()
|
No changing rules ![]() I thought that was a rule in itself, and the timing of it is a rule also in essence
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Fun Area · Next Topic » |




![]](http://z2.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



*go start new round*



)


2:59 AM Jul 12