Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Hello and welcome to KOEI Warriors (Forum), the official leading Rank 1 forum of ZetaBoards free online service of thousands of message boards aimed at video gaming; specifically the best KOEI TECMO fan site online! With over 35,000 forum members already a part of the community and millions of comments recorded! Thank you for visiting, we hope you enjoy the message board!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. By signing up and experiencing KOEI Warriors message board you will have access to features that are member-only such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, voting in recognized polls, and more importantly discussion and the latest news from KOEI TECMO with fellow fans of their products. Our Members Only section via joining will grant you KOEI Warriors graphics, downloads and more.

We also have social network pages on Facebook, Twitter and a videos channel on YouTube, so please find us there.

If you need any help please don't hesitate to ask a member of staff/moderator. Thank you.


Regards,
KOEI Warriors Staff Team


Join our community at KOEI Warriors (Forum)!

Already a member? Welcome back, please login here and enjoy KOEI Warriors (Forum).

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
KOEI Warriors Lounge; Discuss what's on your mind.
Topic Started: Sat Mar 28, 2009 7:16 am (5,970,517 Views)
Ryō Genken
Member Avatar
Disciplined Mind
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
That's really you Frau. I'll be honest.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Uta is an odd one, tough to figure out, but i'd say thats a good description
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fräulein
Member Avatar
full offense
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
when you put it that way, it does seem like it would fit me
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ryō Genken
Member Avatar
Disciplined Mind
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
@Scottie: I've tried saying that..but to be honest..personally that argument has quite bit of fallacy..let me give my personal statement:
"If you are saying that you want to control overpopulation. Then no need for acknowledging that. We can just use 2 child policy here. If not for our corrupt government. It'll work and it has no need to acknowledge that gay marriage. Plus..some gays still wants a child AND if the skin graft from same sex was a success..then what's the point of controlling overpopulation with gays WHEN gays CAN and WANT child themselves."

By all means this is not attacking LGBT member here..i'm sorry but this is my personal thought because i need to think this carefully.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fräulein
Member Avatar
full offense
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
well it turns out all my coworkers were right about ohio voting against legalizing marijuana
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Fräulein
Wed Nov 4, 2015 2:09 pm
when you put it that way, it does seem like it would fit me
I think ultimately he is both a good character and a good person, I like him quite a lot personally, theres just a lot of mystery around him, surprised hes an option considering such, i do think it suits you though
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Eni
BOOEH
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Posted Image

I didn't notice last night that Orianna was in this. :wub:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Ryō Genken
Wed Nov 4, 2015 2:13 pm
@Scottie: I've tried saying that..but to be honest..personally that argument has quite bit of fallacy..let me give my personal statement:
"If you are saying that you want to control overpopulation. Then no need for acknowledging that. We can just use 2 child policy here. If not for our corrupt government. It'll work and it has no need to acknowledge that gay marriage. Plus..some gays still wants a child AND if the skin graft from same sex was a success..then what's the point of controlling overpopulation with gays WHEN gays CAN and WANT child themselves."

By all means this is not attacking LGBT member here..i'm sorry but this is my personal thought because i need to think this carefully.
I dont think theres fallacy, I see where you are coming form though, but ultimately what i said are counterpoints to two different arguments they could make. What you've said ehre is just sort of vehemently scrambling around to deny homosexuals out of an obvious and irrational hatred of them so its not a sound argument. But ultiamtely, saying that someone who cannot produce children are useless is wrong because overpopulation is an issue, so people who cant produce children (especially cant produce children accidentally, which is how most children are born) are useful to society at large, but if they still want to argue that the inability to produce children makes us wrong, the thing is we will be able to in the near future, so once agian, they are wrong.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
tmma1869
Supreme Warrior-Scholar
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Nope. I either cannot find or will never ever know the English word for sumbongero or sumbongera... But I swear some people here are like that when things don't go their way... Telling others that they were antagonized over disagreements, often begging for protection. That's the meaning of the Tagalog words, at least how I can define them...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ryō Genken
Member Avatar
Disciplined Mind
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Scottie
Wed Nov 4, 2015 2:35 pm
Ryō Genken
Wed Nov 4, 2015 2:13 pm
@Scottie: I've tried saying that..but to be honest..personally that argument has quite bit of fallacy..let me give my personal statement:
"If you are saying that you want to control overpopulation. Then no need for acknowledging that. We can just use 2 child policy here. If not for our corrupt government. It'll work and it has no need to acknowledge that gay marriage. Plus..some gays still wants a child AND if the skin graft from same sex was a success..then what's the point of controlling overpopulation with gays WHEN gays CAN and WANT child themselves."

By all means this is not attacking LGBT member here..i'm sorry but this is my personal thought because i need to think this carefully.
I dont think theres fallacy, I see where you are coming form though, but ultimately what i said are counterpoints to two different arguments they could make. What you've said ehre is just sort of vehemently scrambling around to deny homosexuals out of an obvious and irrational hatred of them so its not a sound argument. But ultiamtely, saying that someone who cannot produce children are useless is wrong because overpopulation is an issue, so people who cant produce children (especially cant produce children accidentally, which is how most children are born) are useful to society at large, but if they still want to argue that the inability to produce children makes us wrong, the thing is we will be able to in the near future, so once agian, they are wrong.
Umm..i'm sorry. This is actually my personal statement:
1) You said gays control Overpopulation, because they won't have a child. So far so true right? Gays cannot have children, due to that number of children are lessening.
But then..
2) Gays now can have children due to skin grafting or let's say in vitro with some sperm bank or ovum bank something like gays nowaday use to have a child. Gays can have children, due to that number of children are growing.

It's contradicting. I hope you understand though scottie. But let's take this to PM or thread in debates one. Since this is the lighthearted thread.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

But I'm not saying gays control overpopulation, we dont, thats a ridiculous statement. Im saying that stating that someone who cannot have children are useless is wrong when we have such rampant overpopulation.

And Even taking into acocunt things like in vitro, gays still cannot accidentally have children, which is by far and large the way most people are born, thus even though we CAN have children, we are not a danger to overpopulation because we are forced o control when we do have childrne, Not to mention in vitro and the inevitable skin graph children will be/are increddibly expensive, so they qare not common, and once agian, not a danger to overpopulation.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nuriko
Member Avatar
the perfect Family
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
O.o boy I woke up to a doozy didn't i?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dancingswan
Member Avatar

[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Where is that Kingdom Hearts trailer???? I feel like being disappointed.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ryō Genken
Member Avatar
Disciplined Mind
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
OK..i think i can get the general statement. Well hopefully i can input this with my native language and tried to debate it that way, even though it's useless.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Eni
BOOEH
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Oh boy the DoA3X preorder costumes.

What could possibly go wrong.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dancingswan
Member Avatar

[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
"18" year olds in tiny bikinis I'm guessing.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Eni
BOOEH
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Well if you really want to see...
Spoiler: click to toggle


Honestly I don't mind this kind of stuff. But the face looks disturbing as hell.
Edited by Eni, Wed Nov 4, 2015 3:00 pm.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nuriko
Member Avatar
the perfect Family
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Yawns still too early
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fräulein
Member Avatar
full offense
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
that pose makes her look like a puppet
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
tmma1869
Supreme Warrior-Scholar
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Marie Rose confirmed literal Rachel Alucard clone, only with different eye color and personality :blink:

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nuriko
Member Avatar
the perfect Family
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
My only problems with costumes of that nature is the age of the characters,grown women I'm perfectly fine giving sexy attire and drooling over it,but they also tend to give such costumes to minor characters and THAT bothers me
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
tmma1869
Supreme Warrior-Scholar
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Posted Image
Oh wait. That Marie Rose pic is more like Raquel Alucard... And Raquel loves getting naked aside from wearing a cloak to poor Naoto's dismay.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dancingswan
Member Avatar

[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Eni
Wed Nov 4, 2015 2:58 pm
Well if you really want to see...
Spoiler: click to toggle


Honestly I don't mind this kind of stuff. But the face looks disturbing as hell.
yikes
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
tmma1869
Supreme Warrior-Scholar
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Swan, is that Numb Blade? Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Eni
BOOEH
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Dynasty Girl
Wed Nov 4, 2015 3:05 pm
My only problems with costumes of that nature is the age of the characters,grown women I'm perfectly fine giving sexy attire and drooling over it,but they also tend to give such costumes to minor characters and THAT bothers me
Well she's 18 so it's ok. :^]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
Learn More · Sign-up for Free
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Fun Area · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Composed & Designed by, ©KOEI Warriors, 2005-2017. All rights reserved.