| Welcome to fantasybookingleague.com. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| title history question | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 13 2015, 03:00 PM (56 Views) | |
| hartlekd | Apr 13 2015, 03:00 PM Post #1 |
|
MooseKingKeith
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
so this is hypethical and a "speak now or forever hold your peace" kind of thing but would anyone need to have a page that shows defenses ala the UFC title history? I think this would be much like ROH's website but could be a huge clusterfuck if the belt is defended frequently. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UFC_champions |
![]() |
|
| Maxy | Apr 13 2015, 03:10 PM Post #2 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
While a good theory in theory I don't see a need for it. Unlike the UFC, titles in wrestling are defended more often. It would be interesting to see who has all challenged and failed but I don't see the need for having it be a site feature. |
![]() |
|
| hartlekd | Apr 13 2015, 03:11 PM Post #3 |
|
MooseKingKeith
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
that's what I was thinking especially with all the weird multi challenger defenses, battle royals, cash ins, etc but was just throwing it out there to take the temperature of the room on it |
![]() |
|
| Maxy | Apr 13 2015, 03:18 PM Post #4 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Understandable. |
![]() |
|
| UK-Joe | Apr 13 2015, 04:19 PM Post #5 |
|
Executive VP of Talent Relations and Interim General Manager
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My worry would be it's a lot if work for Keith when realistically, his time would be best keeping on top of the talent roster limits etc. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Maxy | Apr 13 2015, 04:37 PM Post #6 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Actually, his time would be best getting his first show finished. |
![]() |
|
| CJStyles | Apr 13 2015, 05:39 PM Post #7 |
|
The Phenomenal One
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I agree his time would be better suited just focusing on roster list, availability and title history. Also writing shows.. I know you've gone with long form shows, but maybe try doing a recap style. It'll be shorter and easier to churn out shows. |
| |
![]() |
|
| hartlekd | Apr 14 2015, 08:19 AM Post #8 |
|
MooseKingKeith
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Truth be told after going to wrestling school I better realize some of the art of booking by having a slow build so it means something when it's over. I may try do smaller shows weekly and then do my old long form style on PPVs. |
![]() |
|
| CJStyles | Apr 14 2015, 01:53 PM Post #9 |
|
The Phenomenal One
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Okay... We weren't talking about slow build we were just talking about completing the first show. I'm all for slow build booking, but I think what we are trying to say is maybe you should do a style like UK- Joe and Maxy for weekly shows if the long format is too long for the crazy life schedule. I understand this is a hobby, but I think a recap style would benefit in getting more shows up and developing the feuds and such. So it's not a hoarding thing, but I understand you're organizing the roster limits, title history of all the companies and have a life outside of FBL like we all do. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Maxy | Apr 14 2015, 03:16 PM Post #10 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Not to sound generic but what CJ said. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z2.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)





2:14 PM Jul 11